Error in Taylor polynomial of e^x

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the Taylor polynomial of degree 9 for the function f(x) = e^x around x=0 and estimating the error in the approximation of e. The error term is expressed as R_n(x) = \frac{f^{(n+1)}(z)}{(n+1)!}(x-a)^{n+1} = \frac{e^z}{10!}, with z constrained between 0 and 1. Participants debate the upper bound for the error, with one suggesting that using 3 instead of e is acceptable since e is approximately 2.71828, thus justifying the assumption that e < 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series expansion
  • Familiarity with the function e^x
  • Knowledge of factorial notation and its application in Taylor polynomials
  • Basic concepts of error estimation in numerical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Taylor series and their convergence properties
  • Learn about error bounds in Taylor polynomial approximations
  • Explore numerical methods for approximating e, such as continued fractions
  • Investigate the properties of exponential functions and their derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in numerical analysis or approximation techniques for exponential functions.

flash
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Find the Taylor polynomial of degree 9 of

<br /> f(x) = e^x<br />

about x=0 and hence approximate the value of e. Estimate the error in the approximation.

I have written the taylor polynomial and evaluated for x=1 to give an approximation of e.
Its just the error that is confusing me. I have:

<br /> R_n(x) = \frac{f^{(n+1)}(z)}{(n+1)!}(x-a)^{n+1} = \frac{e^z}{10!}<br />

and I need to find an upper bound for this to give the maximum error of the approximation.
So far I have

<br /> 0 &lt; z &lt; 1, e^0 &lt; e^z &lt; e^1<br />
and then

<br /> \frac{1}{10!} &lt; \frac{e^z}{10!} &lt; \frac{e}{10!}<br />

but then the upper bound has an e in it. In a similar example in the book they have just put in 3 instead of e, I guess making the assumption that e < 3. But I'm thinking if i do this I should somehow show that e < 3.

Thanks for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you first approximated e using your Taylor polynomial? That should suggest that e< 3.
 
I have, the approximation less than 3 but that doesn't necessarily mean that the actual value (taylor approximation + error) is < 3, does it?
 
You do not need to show e < 3. Everyone know e is 2.71828 18284 59045 23536... :D

To be honest, I never knew approximation would give lower value (surprised!), but it should be obvious .. see the red line http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Exp_derivative_at_0.svg

You are trying to get upper error bound; mine prof said it doesn't matter what you pick (50,100,..) it just have to be above the max function value!

so e^1 = 1+1+1/2+1/6+.. (you know little more than 2)
Why should take risk of using something like 2.5..
simply pick 3!
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies. I had another idea, I could show (by taking the lower sum of small interval slices) that the area under the graph of 1/x between 1 and 3 has to be greater than 1, therefore 3 > e.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
651
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K