Estimate a number within two (or more) overlapping ranges of number

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lost&found
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Estimate Overlapping
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating a number within overlapping ranges of estimates generated by a simulation, specifically ranges with varying accuracy levels from 30% to 100%. The example provided includes a 30% estimate range of 185 to 285 and a 100% estimate range of 219 to 249, with the simulation output being 235. A method using linear functions to find the intersection of these ranges is proposed, resulting in a prediction of 233.4, which is close to the actual output. The conversation explores the reliability of this method and the potential for improvement by incorporating additional ranges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear functions and interpolation techniques
  • Familiarity with statistical estimation methods
  • Knowledge of simulation modeling concepts
  • Basic grasp of confidence intervals and their significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research linear interpolation techniques in statistical analysis
  • Explore advanced simulation modeling methods
  • Learn about weighting intervals based on confidence levels
  • Investigate the use of multiple regression analysis for predictive modeling
USEFUL FOR

Data scientists, statisticians, and analysts involved in predictive modeling and estimation, as well as anyone interested in improving the accuracy of simulations through mathematical methods.

lost&found
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Let's say a simulation outputs a range of estimates with various accuracy level, ranging from 30% to 100%, with the range given at 30% being widest and the range at 100% being the narrowest. The ultimate goal of this simulation is to arrive at a single number within the estimated range.

For example, 30% estimate is 185 to 285 and 100% estimate is 219 to 249. (There are intermediate estimated ranges with accuracy ranging from 31% to 99%, but I've left out for now.)

The result of the simulation: 235. Not sure what the algorithm was for the simulation (I was leaning toward RNG), but given the information of the different sets of ranges, can we predict this number reliably and if so, how does such method work? Will having more sets of ranges give a more reliable prediction?

-----
I've been told that if we model each range as a linear function as followed:

f(x)= (285-185)x + 185
g(x)= (249-219)x + 219

Then finding the intersection of the two lines will yield the answer:

Set f(x)=g(x), solve for x, and sub it back into f(x), yielding f(34/70)=233.4

-----

233.4 is so really close to the actual 235. This method mirrors linear interpolation isn't it? So same questions as above (if this is how we predict the number, how/why does it work? and can we improve on our prediction, perhaps with more ranges?), if someone could kindly answers, thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a lot of guesswork in this question. What immediately came to mind was to weight all intervals with their according level of confidence, which basically is the expectation value. But this is only one measure which doesn't distinguish possible preferences or correlations among the intervals.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 112 ·
4
Replies
112
Views
23K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K