ET phone home or anywhere really

  • Thread starter deathtical
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Home
In summary, the conversation discusses the use of radio waves for communication with potential extraterrestrial life and the limitations of this method due to the speed of light. It also brings up the concept of solar sails and how they are powered by photons, which are massless particles that carry momentum. The conversation concludes with a clarification that all types of electromagnetic radiation, including radio waves, are considered light.
  • #1
deathtical
24
0
I know that for the longest time we have been listening to radio waves for some sign of life. I also recently heard that SETI was shut down do to lack of funds recently :cry:. I was just wondering, if there is another intelligent space faring race out there that was capable of extra-solar travel wouldn't they use something other than radio waves to communicate? Aren't radio waves "too slow" for that kind of reliable communication? After all, it takes several min for radio waves to go from here to the moon, so I could imagine what a pain it would be to talk to people that we send to the nearest star. Are there any theories as to how to communicate in more real time over such distances? Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
deathtical said:
I know that for the longest time we have been listening to radio waves for some sign of life. I also recently heard that SETI was shut down do to lack of funds recently :cry:. I was just wondering, if there is another intelligent space faring race out there that was capable of extra-solar travel wouldn't they use something other than radio waves to communicate? Aren't radio waves "too slow" for that kind of reliable communication? After all, it takes several min for radio waves to go from here to the moon, so I could imagine what a pain it would be to talk to people that we send to the nearest star. Are there any theories as to how to communicate in more real time over such distances? Thanks.

Radiowaves travel at the speed of light, since this is the fastest speed possible there is no other option for communication. We can't speculate on whether tool-using life elsewhere in the universe would or would not use radiowaves, all we can do is come up with different methods that we think could be used for communication and look for them. As we don't have an unlimited budget we favour looking for those that make more sense to us because they would be more efficient to use (such as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_line" )

EDIT: forgot to mention it takes light ~1 second to get to the moon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Speed_of_light_from_Earth_to_Moon.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
ryan_m_b said:
Radiowaves travel at the speed of light, since this is the fastest speed possible there is no other option for communication. We can't speculate on whether tool-using life elsewhere in the universe would or would not use radiowaves, all we can do is come up with different methods that we think could be used for communication and look for them. As we don't have an unlimited budget we favour looking for those that make more sense to us because they would be more efficient to use (such as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_line" )

EDIT: forgot to mention it takes light ~1 second to get to the moon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Speed_of_light_from_Earth_to_Moon.gif

Yeah, meant to say Mars not the moon. :wink:

Other thought... I thought nothing could travel at the speed of light. But radio waves do?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
deathtical said:
Yeah, meant to say Mars not the moon. :wink:

Other thought... I thought nothing could travel at the speed of light. But radio waves do?

Nothing with rest mass can travel at the speed of light. Radio waves are photons, which are massless particles; they just have a certain wavelength. Xrays, microwaves, gamma rays and radio waves are all photons with longer wavelengths.
 
  • #5
Cosmo Novice said:
Nothing with rest mass can travel at the speed of light. Radio waves are photons, which are massless particles; they just have a certain wavelength. Xrays, microwaves, gamma rays and radio waves are all photons with longer wavelengths.

OK. Yeah, I remember reading that photons had no mass. Hmm... if photons have no mass then how do solar sails work? Wouldn't there need to be something physical pushing on them to make them move? My understanding was that light was "collected" by the sails and that pushed the sail away from the light source. If light has no mass how does it exert enough force on the sail to make it move?
 
  • #6
Even though photons don't have mass, they do carry momentum (p = E/c), and they tranfer this momentum to the solar sail vehicle.
 
  • #7
How do they transfer that momentum if there is no mass to cause friction?
 
  • #8
deathtical said:
Other thought... I thought nothing could travel at the speed of light. But radio waves do?

Anything massless travels at the speed of light, radio waves are photons with a frequency measured in megahertz but are still photons. Altering the frequency of a photon will alter what part of the http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/EM_Spectrum_Properties_edit.svg" it belongs to.

deathtical said:
How do they transfer that momentum if there is no mass to cause friction?

I believe that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_third_law". I'm not an expert but what I think happens is the photons are absorbed then re-emitted by the atoms in the sail, this results in momentum being thrown one way resulting in momentum in the opposite direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
Hmm... those photons are odd little things. So if what everyone has said is correct, then a solar sail could be potentially driven/powered by light, radio waves, Xrays, microwaves, and gamma rays since they are all photons.?

Actually, let me just try and clarify something... every time I have heard the term photon it was referring to light. But you guys are saying that radio waves, Xrays, microwaves, and gamma rays are also photons. So... is it better to say a photon is just a particle/wave with no mass?
 
  • #10
deathtical said:
Hmm... those photons are odd little things. So if what everyone has said is correct, then a solar sail could be potentially driven/powered by light, radio waves, Xrays, microwaves, and gamma rays since they are all photons.?

Actually, let me just try and clarify something... every time I have heard the term photon it was referring to light. But you guys are saying that radio waves, Xrays, microwaves, and gamma rays are also photons. So... is it better to say a photon is just a particle/wave with no mass?

Light can either mean the electromagnetic spectrum or visible light. So you could say that
radio waves are light, we just can't see them with our eyes.
 
  • #11
deathtical said:
Hmm... those photons are odd little things. So if what everyone has said is correct, then a solar sail could be potentially driven/powered by light, radio waves, Xrays, microwaves, and gamma rays since they are all photons.?

Yep!

Actually, let me just try and clarify something... every time I have heard the term photon it was referring to light. But you guys are saying that radio waves, Xrays, microwaves, and gamma rays are also photons. So... is it better to say a photon is just a particle/wave with no mass?

A photon is the "particle" of all forms of Electromagnetic Radiation. Electromagnetic radiation is everything from radio waves all the way up to gamma rays. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

It is better to say that a photon is massless but has momentum. And yes, it has BOTH wave like and particle like properties, and so does all matter!
 
  • #12
deathtical said:
Aren't radio waves "too slow" for that kind of reliable communication?

I just remembered something, even if we did have a means to communicate faster than light we would then run into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyonic_antitelephone" . Essentially any FTL reply you get to a FTL message will arrive before you sent the original message.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
ryan_m_b said:
I just remembered something, even if we did have a means to communicate faster than light we would then run into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyonic_antitelephone" . Essentially any FTL reply you get to a FTL message will arrive before you sent the original message.

Wouldn't that only apply if you sent it to yourself? If you are sending such a signal to a point that is far away from you (let's just say a light year) then this would just mean that the message would arrive faster than if you sent a radio signal... right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
deathtical said:
Wouldn't that only apply if you sent it to yourself? If you are sending such a signal to a point that is far away from you (let's just say a light year) then this would just mean that the message would arrive faster than if you sent a radio signal... right?

No this is not the case. FTL communication causes causality violations because it contravenes SR. To move/communicate FTL would cause violations in SR as from some valid frames of reference this would be seen to be moving "backwards" in time, these FoR are also valid and so this is a causality violation as an event cannot be seen to have happended before it has actually happened, regardless of the FoR. While still new to SR i believe this a consequence of SR Lorentzian transformations.

There are some good articles online with regards to FTL communication violations. :) Happy reading.
 
  • #15
Drakkith said:
Yep!



A photon is the "particle" of all forms of Electromagnetic Radiation. Electromagnetic radiation is everything from radio waves all the way up to gamma rays. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

That I never knew...but what causes the photon to appear in different forms ie radio waves gamma waves etc. Does it repsond to certain electro magnetic stimuli?

Thanks
 

1. What is "ET phone home"?

"ET phone home" is a famous line from the 1982 science fiction film, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. It is spoken by the character E.T. as he tries to make contact with his home planet.

2. Is it possible for ET to actually phone home?

As a scientist, I cannot definitively answer this question as we have not yet discovered any evidence of extraterrestrial life. However, many scientists believe that there is a possibility of life on other planets and that communication with them may be possible in the future.

3. How would ET be able to communicate with his home planet?

This question is purely speculative as we do not have any information about the technology or communication methods of potential extraterrestrial beings. However, some theories suggest that advanced civilizations may use advanced forms of technology or telepathy for communication.

4. Can we track ET's phone call to his home planet?

Again, this is purely speculative as we do not have any evidence of extraterrestrial life or communication with them. However, in the event that we do make contact with aliens, tracking their communication may be possible with advanced technology and methods.

5. Has there been any documented cases of extraterrestrial communication?

There have been many reported cases of individuals claiming to have had communication with extraterrestrial beings, but none have been scientifically proven. However, there are ongoing efforts by scientists to search for and detect potential signals from other planets or galaxies that could indicate intelligent life forms.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
662
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
729
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
Back
Top