Etiquette of writing research poster acknowledgments?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the etiquette of writing acknowledgments for research posters, emphasizing that acknowledgments should be concise and relevant. It is recommended to acknowledge funding agencies and key contributors, such as supervisors and collaborators, while avoiding personal acknowledgments like thanking parents. The standard format for acknowledgments includes mentioning funding sources and specific contributions from individuals, similar to academic papers. Overall, the consensus is to keep the acknowledgments professional and succinct, suitable for a conference presentation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of academic research presentation formats
  • Familiarity with proper citation and acknowledgment practices
  • Knowledge of funding agencies relevant to the research field
  • Experience in collaborative research environments
NEXT STEPS
  • Review guidelines for writing acknowledgments in academic papers
  • Learn about the role of funding agencies in research projects
  • Explore best practices for presenting at academic conferences
  • Investigate how to effectively collaborate and communicate with research teams
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, graduate students, and academic professionals preparing research posters for conferences who seek to understand the appropriate etiquette for acknowledgments.

CivilSigma
Messages
227
Reaction score
58
I have written the following on my poster:

Special thanks to: "Professor Name" and "Professor Name" for their support through out this project, my numerous colleagues, #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 for their assistance during lab work and last but not least to my parents "Dad" and "Mom" for their support through out this journey.

Is this good enough?

I am not sure if I should actually write the names of my parents and whether I should list all the people who shared tips and tricks with me in the lab.

For the latter, is there a general rule to follow for people who helped me with lab work, i.e helping me only mixing concrete. Can I just list first names when thanking colleagues to save space?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are overdoing it just a bit. This is not your thesis. It is "just" a poster for a presentation, presumably at a conference.

What you should acknowledge is funding agencies, if such were used to support the work. If this is a collaborative work, then the names of all the people involved (including your supervisor), should be listed as the "authors" of the work, even though you may list your name as the first one on that list of authors.

If you feel very strongly about thanking someone not on the list of authors who help you tremendously in the work, then include a brief thank you in the acknowledgment. Otherwise, most of what you intended to include is not necessary.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma
ZapperZ said:
If you feel very strongly about thanking someone not on the list of authors who help you tremendously in the work, then include a brief thank you in the acknowledgment.

A possible example of this would be "Samples provided by Dr. Bunsen Honeydew, Department of Chemistry, Muppet University". That person should be acknowledged, because their work is critical, but not an author if they are not responsible for the scientific conclusions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma
It should be very similar to what you see in a paper. The standard form would be something like,

"This work was supported by *FUNDING AGENCY* grants XXX and YYY. The authors gratefully acknowledge the *helpful discussions with/samples provided by* Prof. X and Dr. Y"

It's not a thesis acknowledgment, definitely don't thank your parents. If you want to refer to colleagues, use their title and last name. I would not list everyone. I wouldn't make it much longer than what I outlined above, it's just a poster.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
540
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
825
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K