Schools Etiquette of writing research poster acknowledgments?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the appropriate way to acknowledge contributions on a presentation poster. It is suggested that acknowledgments should be concise and focused on significant contributions, such as funding agencies and key collaborators. Listing all individuals who assisted in minor tasks, like mixing concrete, is generally discouraged. Instead, it is recommended to include only those who made substantial contributions, with a brief acknowledgment for others if necessary. The format for acknowledgments should resemble that of academic papers, emphasizing professional titles and last names rather than first names or personal relationships, such as thanking parents. Overall, the consensus is to keep the acknowledgment section succinct and relevant to the work presented.
CivilSigma
Messages
227
Reaction score
58
I have written the following on my poster:

Special thanks to: "Professor Name" and "Professor Name" for their support through out this project, my numerous colleagues, #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 for their assistance during lab work and last but not least to my parents "Dad" and "Mom" for their support through out this journey.

Is this good enough?

I am not sure if I should actually write the names of my parents and whether I should list all the people who shared tips and tricks with me in the lab.

For the latter, is there a general rule to follow for people who helped me with lab work, i.e helping me only mixing concrete. Can I just list first names when thanking colleagues to save space?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are overdoing it just a bit. This is not your thesis. It is "just" a poster for a presentation, presumably at a conference.

What you should acknowledge is funding agencies, if such were used to support the work. If this is a collaborative work, then the names of all the people involved (including your supervisor), should be listed as the "authors" of the work, even though you may list your name as the first one on that list of authors.

If you feel very strongly about thanking someone not on the list of authors who help you tremendously in the work, then include a brief thank you in the acknowledgment. Otherwise, most of what you intended to include is not necessary.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes CivilSigma
ZapperZ said:
If you feel very strongly about thanking someone not on the list of authors who help you tremendously in the work, then include a brief thank you in the acknowledgment.

A possible example of this would be "Samples provided by Dr. Bunsen Honeydew, Department of Chemistry, Muppet University". That person should be acknowledged, because their work is critical, but not an author if they are not responsible for the scientific conclusions.
 
  • Like
Likes CivilSigma
It should be very similar to what you see in a paper. The standard form would be something like,

"This work was supported by *FUNDING AGENCY* grants XXX and YYY. The authors gratefully acknowledge the *helpful discussions with/samples provided by* Prof. X and Dr. Y"

It's not a thesis acknowledgment, definitely don't thank your parents. If you want to refer to colleagues, use their title and last name. I would not list everyone. I wouldn't make it much longer than what I outlined above, it's just a poster.
 
  • Like
Likes CivilSigma
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
I am currently in the second (and final) year of my MS in Physics. I've just started my research, which focuses on identifying Dark Matter through Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) extensions. My supervisor has directed me to learn model building using FeynRules and subsequent calculations via MadGraph or other simulators. I've successfully built models for QED and QCD, and I am now working on Weak Interactions, Electroweak theory, and symmetry breaking. My immediate goal for the next few...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top