The discussion revolves around the etymology of the term 'base' in chemistry, exploring its historical context and the reasons behind its naming. Participants examine the connections between bases and acids, as well as the linguistic origins of related terms.
Participants express various hypotheses regarding the etymology of 'base', but no consensus is reached on a definitive explanation. Multiple competing views and theories remain present in the discussion.
The discussion highlights the lack of clarity surrounding the original rationale for the term 'base', with references to historical definitions and linguistic origins that may not fully resolve the question.
Bases
Bases were identified and categorised as the substances which are neutralising acids. For that reason, the progress in the characterisation of bases was always connected to the more popular characterisation of acids. As a consequence, the theories for bases were always overshadowed by the theories for acids. Nevertheless, bases have also been known for a long time.
The associated word 'alkaline' (which is used to describe the properties of a base-solution, like its soapy taste) has Arabic roots. The term originally meant 'roasting', because the first alkaline substances were obtained by roasting ashes then treating them with water and slaked lime (calcium hydroxide). The substances obtained are sodium and potassium hydroxide, two of the most classic bases, which were used to make soap.
The use of the word 'base' to describe these substances was introduced a lot later; the original rationale remains obscure. One possibility is that the 'bases' were the basic (in the sense of 'fundamental') compounds used to form salts with acids. Another possibility is that it's called that just to add confusion. The second theory has many adherents among chemistry students.
Its modern meaning and general
introduction into the chemical vocabulary,
however, is usually attributed to the
French chemist, Guillaume-François
Rouelle (1703–1770), who used the
term in a memoir on salts written in
1754 (5). In this paper, which was an
extension of an earlier memoir on the
same subject written in 1744 (6),
Rouelle pointed out that the number of
known salts had increased significantly
during the 17th and early 18th centuries,
due not only to the preparation of
new salts, but also to an increasing ability
to distinguish between sodium and
potassium compounds, and to a generalization
of the concept so as to include
many substances, such as the alums and
vitriols (i.e., sulfates), that had been previously
excluded.
In order to incorporate this extended
concept of salt formation,
Rouelle explicitly defined a neutral salt
as the product formed by the union of
an acid with any substance, be it a watersoluble
alkali, a volatile alkali, an absorbent
earth, a metal, or an oil, capable of
serving as “a base” for the salt “by giving
it a concrete or solid form”.