http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/21/health/vaccines-illness-european-court-bn/index.html If I understood correctly, the court found that the circumstance of getting a vaccine can be attributed to later problems, without any scientific reports to back up the assertion. Maybe my view is oversimplified. Anyone with a better or different take on this? Because a priori this looks like guilt by association. Ex: Your brother committed a crime. You live with your brother so therefore you too are guilty without any other corroborating evidence. Even if I have it partly wrong, it still looks like Science from the court of Henry VIII of England.