Euclidean Killing Field Question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kreizhn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euclidean Field
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1
Hey,

This may seem like a simple question, but hopefully someone can answer it quickly.

Consider the Euclidean 2-metric [itex]ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2[/itex]. There are three killing fields, two translations
[tex]K_1 = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}, \qquad K_2 = \frac{\partial}{\partial y}[/tex]
and a rotation. Now my issue is this, if [itex]K_3[/itex] is the rotational Killing field, with coordinate decomposition
[tex]K_3 = K_3^x \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + K_3^y \frac{\partial}{\partial y}[/tex]
We can show that [itex]K_3[/itex]'s components must satisfy the differential question
[tex]\frac{\partial K^y}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial K^x}{\partial y} = 0[/tex]
Hence we can have two solutions [itex](K^x,K^y) = (-y,x)[/itex] and [itex](K^x,K^y) = (y, -x)[/itex]. Clearly these are just a multiple of -1 different. But if one were to plot these, they would give rotations in opposite directions. One would move clockwise, the other counter-clockwise.

Do we care about the orientation of the field? Or just it's general flow? Do these both represent the same field all the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it because the flow (as a one parameter semi-group) can move in both directions? Hence the flow generated by each is equivalent, and just corresponds to taking a negative "time?"