Euler-Lagrange Equation Q: Where Does 2mr˙r˙θ Come From?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter volican
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    euler-lagrange
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of a specific term, 2mr˙r˙θ, in the context of the Euler-Lagrange equation as applied to a variable-length pendulum. Participants explore the mathematical steps involved in differentiating the Lagrangian and the implications of the terms involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the origin of the term 2mr˙r˙θ in the Euler-Lagrange equation, specifically in relation to the variable-length pendulum.
  • Another participant explains that the term arises from the time derivative of the Lagrangian's partial derivative with respect to θ, indicating it equals mr²˙θ.
  • A participant acknowledges understanding the derivation of mr²˙θ and -mgrsinθ but expresses confusion regarding the term 2mr˙r˙θ, contemplating whether dr/dt can be ignored in the Euler-Lagrange equation.
  • Further clarification is provided through a mathematical derivation showing that differentiating mr²˙θ leads to the inclusion of the term 2mr˙r˙θ along with mr²¨θ.
  • Participants discuss the application of the chain rule in differentiating r², confirming its use in the derivation process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the derivation of the term 2mr˙r˙θ, with some clarity achieved through mathematical explanation, but no consensus is reached on the implications of ignoring dr/dt.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the applicability of the Euler-Lagrange equation to the variable-length pendulum and the conditions under which certain terms can be considered negligible.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the mathematical foundations of classical mechanics, particularly those studying Lagrangian mechanics and its applications to dynamic systems.

Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Volican, :welcome:

It comes from the time derivative of ##\partial {\mathcal L}\over \partial \dot\theta## $${\partial {\mathcal L}\over \partial \dot\theta }= mr^2\dot \theta $$
 
Thanks for writting back, much appreciated. I can see where that comes from and also the -mgrsinθ but can't see how they got the 2mr˙r˙θ. Any ideas? I am thinking that I can just completley ignore the dr/dt as it is not in the euler lagrange equation? Is this wrong?
 
$$
{d\over dt} \left ( {\partial {\mathcal L}\over \partial \dot\theta } \right ) = {d\over dt} mr^2\dot \theta = m {d\over dt} \left ( r^2\right ) \dot \theta + mr^2 {d\over dt} \dot \theta = 2mr\dot r\dot\theta + mr^2\ddot\theta$$
 
Aewsome! to differentiate r^2 did you use the chain rule?
 
Yes, the chain rule is awesome :smile: $$
{d\over dt} r^2 = {d\over dt} \left ( r \right ) r + r {d\over dt} \left ( r \right ) = 2 r\dot r $$

Make sure you speak this jargon fluently when pursuing further studies !
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K