Variable Length Pendulum [SOLVED]

[Zoidberg]

[SOLVED] Variable Length Pendulum

Hi, everybody! I'm not sure about my solution to the problem.

Homework Statement

Consider a simple pendulum with variable length r(t). The suspension point remains fixed.
(i)Write the Lagrangian for the pendulum and the equations of motion.
(ii)Write the Hamiltonian for the system.
(iii)Calculate the total mechanical energy of the system.

Homework Equations

Lagrangian: L=T-V
Euler-Lagrange equation: $$\frac{d~}{dt} \ \left( \, \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i} \, \right) \ - \ \frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} \ = \ 0$$
Legendre transform of the Lagrangian: $$H\left(q_j,p_j,t\right) = \sum_i \dot{q}_i p_i - L(q_j,\dot{q}_j,t)$$

The Attempt at a Solution

(i) I think the system has only one degree of freedom, the angle $$\theta$$. The kinetic energy of the system is $$T=\frac{m}{2}\left( \dot{r}^2+r^2 \dot{\theta}^2\right)$$. The potential potential energy is $$V=-mgr \cos\theta$$.
$$\Rightarrow L=\frac{m}{2}\left( \dot{r}^2+r^2 \dot{\theta}^2\right)+mgr \cos\theta$$.
Using the Euler-Lagrange equation for $$q=\theta: 2mr\dot{r}\dot{\theta}+mr^2 \ddot{\theta}-mgr\sin\theta =0$$
(ii)With the generalized momenta $$p_{\theta}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}=mr^2 \dot{\theta} \Leftrightarrow \dot{\theta}=\frac{p_{\theta}}{mr^2}$$ I can write the Hamiltonian $$H=p_\theta \dot{\theta} -L=\frac{p_\theta}{2mr^2}-\frac{m}{2}\dot{r}^2-mgr\cos\theta$$. The Hamiltonian is not conserved since r=r(t) is time dependent.
(iii) The total energy of the system is $$E=T+V=\frac{p_\theta}{2mr^2}+\frac{m}{2}\dot{r}^2-mgr\cos\theta$$

 

[maverick280857]

Math seems fine, but $r$ and $\theta$ are both changing with time. How exactly are you defining the degree of freedom?

 

[Dick]

Math seems fine, but $r$ and $\theta$ are both changing with time. How exactly are you defining the degree of freedom?

r is a fixed function of time r(t). You can't predict its values from the dynamics.

 

[Zoidberg]

First I was confused about $$H(\theta,p_{\theta})\neq E$$, but after reading some books this seems to be a classic example of this type of problem. If I understand this correct r(t) is a holonomic constraint.
Anyway the solution seems to be correct. Thanks for your responses.

 

[kdv]

First I was confused about $$H(\theta,p_{\theta})\neq E$$, but after reading some books this seems to be a classic example of this type of problem. If I understand this correct r(t) is a holonomic constraint.
Anyway the solution seems to be correct. Thanks for your responses.

What happens is that the system is not isolated, there is some extrenal force dictating how r changes with time. In that case H will not be E. The same thing happens, for example, when there is something rotating at a constant angular velocity, which means there is an extrenal force acting and forcing the rotation.

 

[maverick280857]

r is a fixed function of time r(t). You can't predict its values from the dynamics.

Ok, so its essentially given.

 

[Dick]

Ok, so its essentially given.

Right. It could also as Zoidberg pointed out, could be considered as a constraint.

 

[mma]

I can write the Hamiltonian $$H=p_\theta \dot{\theta} -L=\frac{p_\theta}{2mr^2}-\frac{m}{2}\dot{r}^2-mgr\cos\theta$$.

Shouldn't p_Θ appear on the second power here?

(off: why can't I write latex formulas? The preview shows a completely different formulas from that I write down. E.g. how $$p_\theta$$ looks like?)

edit: wow! now it displays good. Only the preview was wrong.