MHB Evaluate ∠APR if ∠APQ=3∠APR and ∠PAQ=45°

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $A$ be the midpoint of the side $QR$ on a triangle $PQR$. Given that $\angle APQ=3\angle APR$ and $\angle PAQ=45^\circ$, evaluate $\angle APR$.
This is an unsolved problem I found @ AOPS.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]
[TIKZ]\coordinate [label=below left:{$Q$}] (Q) at (-5,0) ;
\coordinate [label=left:{$P$}] (P) at (-3.5,3.5) ;
\coordinate [label=below right:{$R$}] (R) at (5,0) ;
\coordinate [label=below:{$A$}] (A) at (0,0) ;
\coordinate [label=below:{$N$}] (N) at (-3.5,0) ;
\draw (P) -- node
{$x$} (N) ;
\node [fill=white] at (-3.4,2.85) {$3\theta$} ;
\draw [thick] (P) -- (Q) -- (R) -- cycle ;
\draw [thick] (A) -- (P) ;
\node at (-0.7,0.25) {$45^\circ$} ;
\node at (-2.5,2.85) {$\theta$} ;
\node at (-1.75,-0.25) {$x$} ;[/TIKZ]
Choose a unit of length so that $\overline{QA} = \overline{AR} = 1$. Let $PN$ be the perpendicular from $P$ to $QR$ and let $x = \overline{PN} = \overline{NA}.$ Write $\theta$ for $^\angle APR$, so that $^\angle APQ = 3\theta.$ Then $\tan(^\angle NPR) = \dfrac{1+x}x$, and $$\tan\theta = \tan(^\angle NPR - 45^\circ) = \frac{\frac{1+x}x - 1}{1 + \frac{1+x}x} = \frac1{2x+1}.$$ Similarly, $\tan(^\angle NPQ) = \dfrac{1-x}x$, and $$\tan(3\theta) = \tan(^\angle NPQ + 45^\circ) = \frac{\frac{1-x}x + 1}{1 - \frac{1-x}x} = \frac1{2x-1}.$$ But $\tan(3\theta) = \dfrac{3\tan\theta - \tan^3\theta}{1 - 3\tan^2\theta}.$ So (*deep breath*) $$\frac1{2x-1} = \frac{\frac3{2x+1} - \frac1{(2x+1)^3}}{1 - \frac3{(2x+1)^2}}.$$ After multiplying out all the fractions (and in my case, doing so several times until I weeded out all the mistakes), this reduces to $16x^3 - 8x = 0$, for which the only positive solution is $x = \dfrac1{\sqrt2}.$
Thus $$\tan\theta = \frac 1{2x+1} = \frac1{\sqrt2 + 1} = \sqrt2 - 1.$$ The answer to the problem is then $^\angle APR = 22.5^\circ$, as you can check by verifying that $\tan(2\theta) = 1$.

Notice that $4\theta = 90^\circ.$ Hence $^\angle QPR$ is a right angle. I assume that there must be an elegant geometric solution to this problem which somehow exploits that fact, but I have no ideas along those lines.
[/sp]​
 
Hi Opalg!

I can't tell you enough how much I appreciate your participation to the two unsolved challenges of mine...and you definitely are on a roll to manage in solving these two hardest challenges that bothered me for quite some time...

I just want to thank you and I also want to tell you that you are my math hero who I hold in the highest esteem! (Blush)(Nod)(Sun)

I thought there might be an elegant geometric way to solve the problem too, and I will definitely try it when I have the time because it is too interesting a problem that one can hardly resist not to attempt at it!(Tmi)
 
anemone said:
I thought there might be an elegant geometric way to solve the problem too
[sp]As soon as you know that $x = 1/\sqrt2$, it follows (by looking at the triangle $PNA$) that $\overline{AP} = 1$. So $Q,P,R$ all lie on a circle centred at $A$. It then easily follows that $\theta = 22.5^\circ$, and also explains the right angle at $P$. But I don't see how to show that $\overline{AP} = 1$ without using the clunky trigonometric calculation.[/sp]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top