Evaluation of a reduction formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewtonianAlch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Reduction
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[itex]\int[/itex] (1 - x^2)^n dx = [itex]\frac{2n}{2n+1}[/itex] [itex]\int[/itex] (1 - x^2)^n-1 dx

for n greater or equal to 1, find [itex]\int[/itex] (1 - x^2)^4 dx

The integrals go from 0 to 1

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well what I did was to keep doing n - 1 whilst pulling a fraction outside the integral and multiplying each subsequent fraction.

So I ended up with 8/9 * 6/7 * 4/5 and the integral of (1 - x) which became x - x^2/2

Substituting in 1 and 0, subtracting and the multiplying by the fractions I got 192/305*1/2 which simplifies to 96/305.

Is this the correct procedure for evaluating reduction formulae, and was my answer correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get:

[itex]\int_0^1 (1 - x^2)^4 dx = \frac{8}{9}\frac{6}{7}\frac{4}{5}\frac{2}{3}\int_0^1 1 dx[/itex]

So the answer is: [itex]\frac{(8)(6)(4)(2)}{(9)(7)(5)(3)} = \frac{2^7}{(3^2)(5)(7)} = \frac{128}{315}[/itex]

Wolframe Alpha agrees with the above answer.
 
Ahh, I see my mistake now, for n greater or equal to 1, I needed to have reduced it one more time to get the 2/3.

Thanks
 
I'd like to know if possible what page you used to cross check that, I'm looking at Wolfram Alpha and can't really find anything to evaluate reduction formulae, though I can see the step-by-step integrator.
 
You don't need to give WA the correct formulas with which to evaluate an integral...
"int from 0 to 1 (1-x^2)^4"
returns 128/315
See: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=int+from+0+to+1+(1-x^2)^4
It will do infinite sums, limits and derivatives too. I find it really useful for checking work.
 
Awesome, thanks for that.