Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Event horizon radius

  1. Jun 19, 2011 #1
    Are there any known metrics in which blackholes do not have the Schwarzschild radius? Specifically, I'm interested in whether it's possible for a blackhole to have an event horizon which is not of the form: constant * mass.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 19, 2011 #2
    The event horizon for a rotating black hole does not only depend on the mass but also on the angular momentum.
     
  4. Jun 20, 2011 #3

    Bill_K

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    No. The most general black hole is represented by the Kerr-Newman solution, and it has this property.
     
  5. Jun 20, 2011 #4
    Kerr-Newman don't have the property that the radius is proportional to the mass times a constant. It depends on both the angular momentum(as passionflower said) and the charge.

    Also Kerr-Newman is not the most general black hole. It is only the most general stationary solution to the Einstein-Maxwell equations in four dimensions. There are obviously many more general solutions like for example time dependent ones with matter falling to the horizon.

    The Schwarzschild solution is a very very special case.
     
  6. Jun 20, 2011 #5

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The OP asked if there are black holes which do not have a schwarzchild radius i.e. r = 2GM. The kerr - newman solution is the most general stationary solution that DOES have this property.
     
  7. Jun 20, 2011 #6
    No, for a kerr black hole
    [itex]r = M + \sqrt{M^2-a^2}[/itex]


    in units G=1 where a = J/M and J is angular momentum.

    Go read a book!
     
  8. Jun 20, 2011 #7

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    That is a definition of r to find the location of the horizon in the kerr geometry i.e. at [tex]g_{rr} = \infty [/tex]. This has nothing to with the fact that r = 2M IS the schwarzchild radius for a kerr black hole.
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2011
  9. Jun 20, 2011 #8

    Bill_K

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The point is that a is restricted to the range 0 < a < M, so M < r < 2M. The inner horizon is no longer spherical, but its size is proportional to M. In fact this must be the case, since M is the only parameter in the solution that sets the scale.
     
  10. Jun 20, 2011 #9
    r=2M has nothing to do with the event horizon of a Kerr black hole.

    The OP asked whether the event horizon of a black hole is proportional to the mass times a constant. This is only the case for schwarzschild black hole.
     
  11. Jun 20, 2011 #10
    The inner horizon radius is not proportional to the mass either. Take fix J and take M large and the inner horizon shrinks to zero as J/M goes to zero.

    a is not restricted to a<M. a>M is a naked singularity.
     
  12. Jun 20, 2011 #11

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes excuse me I see what you are saying. [tex]g_{rr} = \infty[/tex] and [tex]g_{tt} = 0[/tex] for a schwarzchild black hole is r = 2m but for a kerr black hole the actual horizon (not the ergosphere) [tex]g_{rr} = \infty [/tex] is when [tex]\Delta = 0[/tex]. Thanks mate; indeed I was mixing up the terms for the event horizon and the definition of schwarzchild radius.
     
  13. Jun 20, 2011 #12

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    When "mass" is suitably defined, there are dynamic (non-stationary; no exterior timelike killing vector) black hole spacetimes that don't have this property. For an example that uses the Vaidya metric, see section 5.1.8 on page 132 (pdf page 148) of Eric Poisson's notes,

    http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/poisson/research/agr.pdf,

    which evolved into the excellent book, A Relativist's Toolkit: The Mathematics of black hole Mechanics.

    In this example, the apparent horizon has this property, but (a portion of) the event doesn't.
     
  14. Jun 20, 2011 #13

    edguy99

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I would appreciate if you had any good links to the subject "Kerr-Newman is not the most general black hole"

    I am interested in black holes where a lot of material is falling in from close to the top and bottem of the spinning black hole. Mostly in 3D aspects as I find many references and drawings on the internet really only seem to be 2D in nature (the axis of rotation is not precessing).
     
  15. Jun 20, 2011 #14

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I gave an example for non-spinning black holes in post #12.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Event horizon radius
  1. Event Horizon (Replies: 1)

  2. Event Horizon (Replies: 9)

  3. Event Horizon (Replies: 1)

  4. Event Horizon. (Replies: 8)

Loading...