MHB Example of Set for Relation Restriction to A

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Set
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of restricting a relation R to a set A, defined mathematically as R|A = {<x,y>: x ∈ A and <x,y> ∈ R}. Examples illustrate this concept, such as the relation defined by xRy if y = x^2, where the restriction to the natural numbers results in a domain of natural numbers. Another example involves the relation mRn if m divides n, showing that the restriction to the set {2} yields pairs where n is even. Additionally, the relation mRn if n^2 = m is examined, with its restriction to the set of powers of 2 resulting in a specific domain of square numbers. These examples clarify the relationship between the domain of the original relation and its restriction.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Let $R$ be a relation and $A$ a set.
The restriction of $R$ to $A$ is the set:

$$R\restriction A=\{ <x,y>: x \in A \wedge <x,y> \in R\}=\{ <x,y>: x \in A \wedge xRy\}$$

For a relation $R$ and a set $A$, it stands that:

$$dom(R \restriction A)=dom(R) \cap A$$

Could you give me an example of such a set, so that I can see that the above relation stands? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $R$ is a function from $\Bbb R$ to $\Bbb R$ defined by $xRy\iff y=x^2$, then $R\restriction\Bbb N$ is the restriction of function $R$ to $\Bbb N$ in this sense. Here $\operatorname{dom} R=\Bbb R$ and $\operatorname{dom}(R\restriction\Bbb N)=\Bbb R\cap\Bbb N=\Bbb N$.

If $mRn\iff m\text{ divides }n$ where $m,n\in\Bbb N$, then $R\restriction\{2\}=\{\langle2,n\rangle\mid n\text{ is even}\}$. Here $\operatorname{dom} R=\Bbb N$ and $\operatorname{dom}(R\restriction\{2\})=\Bbb N\cap\{2\}=\{2\}$.

If $mRn\iff n^2=m$ where $m,n\in\Bbb N$, then $\operatorname{dom} R$ is the set $\Bbb S$ of all square numbers. Let $\Bbb P=\{2^n\mid n\in\Bbb N\}$. Then $R\restriction\Bbb P=\{\langle 2^{2n},2^n\rangle\mid n\in\Bbb N\}$ and $\operatorname{dom}(R\restriction\Bbb P)=\Bbb S\cap\Bbb P=\{2^{2n}\mid n\in\Bbb N\}$.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K