Examples of discoveries without a hypothesis?

In summary: Falling apples had been observed to fall always down not up, for a long time before Newton proposed how that could be.I think this is a case in which Röntgen simply discovered them.Well, he was doing an experiment at the time regarding cathode ray tubes, and I assume that he had a hypothesis for that experiment. But it certainly had nothing to do with X-rays. So there was an experiment and there was a hypothesis but it was not related to the important discovery. So I am not sure how to classify that.Also antibiotics.Here there wasn’t an experiment or a hypothesis, just a discovery. So that is a little cleaner.
  • #1
RobertSpencer
18
0
The scientific method is HYPOTHESIS -> EXPERIMENT -> ANALYZE -> CONCLUSION.

There are special cases where there is no HYPOTHESIS.

Can you give some examples of things discovered without giving a HYPOTHESIS?

That is, they do an experiment and they discover something new without a hypothesis?

Any famous examples?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
RobertSpencer said:
That is, they do an experiment and they discover something new without a hypothesis?
Hmm, I am not sure. If there is no hypothesis then could what follows be termed an experiment? Wouldn’t it simply be observations and not an experiment?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #3
Dale said:
Hmm, I am not sure. If there is no hypothesis then could what follows be termed an experiment? Wouldn’t it simply be observations and not an experiment?
X-rays hadn't been a hypothesis nor was it in experiment. I think this is a case in which Röntgen simply discovered them. Rutherford's ##\alpha## radiation might be a similar case.
 
  • Like
Likes RobertSpencer and Orodruin
  • #4
RobertSpencer said:
Any famous examples?
The discovery of the cosmic microwave background.
 
  • #5
Also antibiotics.
 
  • #6
Orodruin said:
Also antibiotics.
Just wanted to add Fleming!
 
  • Like
Likes RobertSpencer
  • #7
Einstein's special relativity -- experimental evidence came first. Einstein explained it after the fact with a theory.

Einstein's general relativity -- Einstein's theory came first, experimental evidence (such as the curvature of the light of stars as it passes the sun) came later.

There's no referee saying that you have to do things in a specific order.
 
  • #8
Superconductivity.
 
  • #9
Gravity?
Falling apples had been observed to fall always down not up, for a long time before Newton proposed how that could be.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
fresh_42 said:
I think this is a case in which Röntgen simply discovered them.
Well, he was doing an experiment at the time regarding cathode ray tubes, and I assume that he had a hypothesis for that experiment. But it certainly had nothing to do with X-rays. So there was an experiment and there was a hypothesis but it was not related to the important discovery. So I am not sure how to classify that.

Orodruin said:
Also antibiotics.
Here there wasn’t an experiment or a hypothesis, just a discovery. So that is a little cleaner.

Edit: I guess what I am saying is that it is clear that you can make discoveries without an experiment, but it is not clear to me that you could have an experiment without a hypothesis.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Well you could stick your arm into a pond of hungry piranha to see what happened, but I guess you still would have to start with a hypothesis.
 
  • #12
There was another important discovery, however, in a sort of experiment. Washing hands before treating patients! Unbelievable but true. I think it was Semmelweis who discovered that the rate of postpartum infections significantly dropped, if he washed his hands before helping at birth. By the way against the habits of his time as well as against the opinion of his colleagues. He didn't have a hypothesis as bacteria have been unknown in these days.
 
  • Like
Likes RobertSpencer
  • #13
Isotope effect in superconductors. The paper begins "The existence of a small amount of Hg-198 at the National Bureau of Standards prompted us to investigate its properties as a superconductor"
 
  • Like
Likes RobertSpencer and Keith_McClary
  • #14
using microwaves to cook food ... GREAT discovery (invention?) but was discovered via a chocolate bar, not a hypothesis.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, RobertSpencer and Keith_McClary
  • #15
In the examples above (penicillin, microwave cooking, X-rays, ...) the discovery happened without a hypothesis, but a hypothesis followed very rapidly. For example, the step from the observation that the bacteria next to the mold dies to the hypothesis that the mold is killing the bacteria is so obvious after the fact that we may overlook it, but it's still there and needed to take the next step on the way to antibiotics.

Without that step, the observation won't be turn into a breakthrough. An example might be Fizeau observing relativistic velocity addition in 1851. A decade before Maxwell's electrodynamics and without Einstein's insight a half-century later, there was no way to turn it into a useful hypothesis, so it went unnoticed and unexploited.
 
  • #16
Bakelite.
Rogaine.
The pacemaker.
Teflon.
Viagra.

Many artificial sweeteners. (One reason they are so much sweeter than sugar is that it';s easier to discover them by accident that way)
 
  • #18
The Sunlight goes away every day, but it always returns.
People die if they are under water for a while.
Saturn has 'ears'
Beer is good to get a relaxed feeling.
 
  • #20
RobertSpencer said:
The scientific method is HYPOTHESIS -> EXPERIMENT -> ANALYZE -> CONCLUSION.

There are special cases where there is no HYPOTHESIS.

Can you give some examples of things discovered without giving a HYPOTHESIS?

That is, they do an experiment and they discover something new without a hypothesis?

Any famous examples?

You need to look for the “Who Ordered That?” Discoveries.

Superconductivity is one of many examples.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes RobertSpencer
  • #21
Muons. Neutrinos.
 
  • #22
Keith_McClary said:
Neutrinos
Neutrinos were experimentally discovered in 1956 and hypothesised in 1931.
 

1. What is a discovery without a hypothesis?

A discovery without a hypothesis is a scientific finding or observation that was not initially predicted or expected by a scientist. It is a result that was stumbled upon during the course of an experiment or study, rather than being specifically sought after.

2. How common are discoveries without a hypothesis?

Discoveries without a hypothesis are relatively uncommon in the scientific community. This is because most scientific research is based on a hypothesis, which serves as a starting point for the study and helps guide the research process. However, unexpected discoveries can still occur, especially in fields such as astronomy and medicine.

3. Can a discovery without a hypothesis still be considered valid?

Yes, a discovery without a hypothesis can still be considered valid as long as it is supported by strong evidence and is reproducible by other scientists. In fact, these types of discoveries can often lead to new hypotheses and further research in a particular field.

4. What are some famous examples of discoveries without a hypothesis?

One famous example is the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming in 1928. While studying bacteria, he noticed that a mold had accidentally contaminated one of his samples and had killed off the bacteria. This unexpected discovery led to the development of the first antibiotic.

Another example is the discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson in 1964. They were studying radio waves when they discovered a constant background noise that could not be explained. This discovery provided strong evidence for the Big Bang theory of the universe's origin.

5. How do discoveries without a hypothesis impact the scientific community?

Discoveries without a hypothesis can have a significant impact on the scientific community. They can challenge existing theories and open up new areas of research. They also serve as a reminder that there is still much to be discovered and that scientific knowledge is constantly evolving and expanding.

Similar threads

A Is "Equal a priori Probabilities" the correct scientific approach?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
10
Views
2K
B Proving the effects of gravity by using the scientific method
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
22
Views
12K
Does the Universe have a finite number of fundamentals to uncover?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
704
B What if tachyons are detected?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
28
Views
2K
Hypothesis: What Does it Really Mean?
    • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Desirable estimator properties...
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
457
B Can you prove anything using the Scientific Method?
    • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
62
Views
6K
B Question about inductive and deductive arguments in science
    • Classical Physics
Replies
34
Views
2K
Why must science have an a priori foundation?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
925
A Photon Bouncing during APD Dead Time in Autocorrelation Measurement
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
619

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top