Exclusion Principle: Do Similar Sub-Atomic Particles Follow?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter khil_phys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the applicability of the exclusion principle to similar sub-atomic particles, particularly focusing on its implications for the formation of stars and the behavior of fermions and bosons under various conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the exclusion principle applies only to identical fermions.
  • Others question how the exclusion principle accounts for the formation of proton stars and dwarf stars, suggesting that there may be special conditions influencing these processes.
  • A later reply introduces the concept that a star exceeding the Chandrasekhar limit may collapse into either a black hole or a neutron star, depending on pressure conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the scope of the exclusion principle and its implications for stellar formation, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of particles and the conditions under which the exclusion principle operates, which are not fully explored or defined.

khil_phys
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Does the exclusion principle hold true only for similar sub-atomic particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It holds only for identical fermions.
 
Alright. But then how is that proton stars are formed due to the exclusion principle repulsion between protons and neutrons and simple dwarf stars are formed due to the exclusion principle repulsion between electrons? Why these reservations? Or do special conditions prevail?
 
This means that a star with mass above the Chandreshekhar limit may either collapse into a black hole or a neutron star, depending upon the amount of pressure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K