Existance of ladder operators for a system

Click For Summary
Ladder operators are primarily associated with systems like the harmonic oscillator and spin states, but they can also be applied to other systems with discrete energy levels, such as the hydrogen atom. These operators exist for any Hamiltonian with eigenstates, allowing the definition of an operator that transitions between states. However, the challenge lies in expressing these operators in a simple form, which is often achievable in symmetric systems. The existence of ladder operators is guaranteed, but their utility and simplicity depend on the underlying symmetry of the system. Overall, ladder operators are a versatile tool in quantum mechanics, applicable beyond traditional examples.
espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2
I have only heard about the use of ladder operators in connection with the harmonic oscillator and spin states. However, I would expect them to be useful in other systems as well.

For example, can we find ladder operators for the discrete states of the hydrogen atom, or any other system with discrete energy levels? Are there established conditions that guarantee their existence?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You also see them as creation and annihilation operators in quantum optics.
The ladder operator makes sense where there is fixed step-size between states. You can try for a counter example by trying to derive a ladder operator for non-harmonic potentials.
 
They always exist. For any Hamiltonian with eigenstates |n> you can always define an operator, a*|n> = |n+1>. But the question is, can a* be written in a simple form.

Generally, a simple form will exist for problems with symmetry, for then the operators will yield an algebraic solution. The hydrogen atom is one example of this, see here.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K