Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for ODE with Initial Conditions y(1)=0

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter supercali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence Uniqueness
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by \((x + y^2)dx - 2xydy = 0\) with the initial condition \(y(1)=0\). The derived solution \(y = \sqrt{x\ln(x)}\) is valid only for \(x \geq 1\) and \(y > 0\). The existence and uniqueness theorem does not apply at \(y=0\), indicating that the solution may not be unique or may not exist for the initial condition provided. The general solution is expressed as \(\ln(x) - \frac{y^2}{x} = c\), which confirms that multiple solutions could exist.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with initial value problems
  • Knowledge of the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs
  • Basic logarithmic and algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the existence and uniqueness theorem for ODEs in detail
  • Explore the implications of initial conditions on ODE solutions
  • Learn about general solutions and particular solutions in ODEs
  • Investigate the behavior of solutions near points of discontinuity
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as researchers exploring the properties of ODEs and their solutions.

supercali
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


given this ODE with initial conditions y(1)=0
\[<br /> (x + y^2 )dx - 2xydy = 0<br /> \]

Homework Equations


solving this ODE gives us
\[y = \sqrt {x\ln (x)} \]
as we can see this equation is true only for x>=1
in order to use the theorem on existence and uniqueness we isulate for y'=f(x,y)
\[y&#039; = \frac{{(x + y^2 )}}{{2xy}}\]
and we can see that when y=0 the equation is not defined

The Attempt at a Solution


my question is
1) if x>=1 does that mean that the bound for y is y>=0?
2)if it meaas that y>=0 then should i conclude that the theorem on existence and uniqueness does not apply here since the function is not continuous thus we can't say that the solution is unique? what does it mean
thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
supercali said:
solving this ODE gives us
\[y = \sqrt {x\ln (x)} \]
That's just one solution for the ODE. The general solution has a constant in there.

\[y&#039; = \frac{{(x + y^2 )}}{{2xy}}\]
and we can see that when y=0 the equation is not defined
The equation is not defined when 2xy=0. So y=0 is not the whole story.

1) if x>=1 does that mean that the bound for y is y>=0?
No. It means that the equation has a unique solution for y>0 and y<0. Since you only found the solution for y>0, your solution is not complete.
 
so i don't get it
the general solution was:
\[\ln (x) - \frac{{y^2 }}{x} = c\]
for the initial conditions y(1)=0
my solution was
\[y = \sqrt {x\ln (x)} \]

so i don't get it what is the final answer for this ODE?
does this slolution apply?
i get it the the ODE has a solution only for y>0 or y<0 but those arent my initial conditions!
so i don't quite understand
 
I'm sorry, my fault. I hadn't seen that you were given an initial condition. Yes, the solution
\[\ln (x) - \frac{{y^2 }}{x} = c\]
is correct (assuming that x > 0, which is the case here). And indeed, the initial condition implies that c = 0. However, the solution
\[y = \sqrt {x\ln (x)} \]
is slightly different (hint: the equation x^2=1 has two solutions).

supercali said:
i get it the the ODE has a solution only for y>0 or y<0 but those arent my initial conditions!
so i don't quite understand

To be more precise: the only thing you know is that the existence and uniqueness theorem does not apply for y = 0. It may be that there is no solution, it may be there is more than one solution, it may even be that there is only one solution.
 
great i understand the explanation one more thing though
since i have found a solution that is:
\[\ln (x) - \frac{{y^2 }}{x} = c\]
and we know that the theorem does not apply for the initial conditions what can i say about this solution?
does it solve the initial problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K