Exists ? : Invariant geodesic equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of a form of the geodesic equation that is invariant under coordinate changes, particularly focusing on the implications of rotational symmetry in three-dimensional space. Participants explore various aspects of the geodesic equation, including its covariant nature and the conditions under which it may or may not hold true.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a geodesic is defined by the condition ##\nabla_{\dot{\gamma}}\dot{\gamma}=0##, but others express uncertainty about the notation used.
  • It is suggested that the geodesic equation cannot be invariant due to having a free vector index, thus being covariant under coordinate changes instead.
  • One participant questions whether there exists a way to express the geodesic equation without relying on coordinates, prompting further clarification from others.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of rotating solutions in a rotationally symmetric space, with some arguing that such rotations should still yield valid solutions, while others challenge this notion.
  • Mathematical expressions are presented to illustrate the dynamics of circular motion, with participants noting contradictions arising from specific assumptions about motion around axes.
  • Corrections are made regarding the equations of motion, with one participant acknowledging a sign mistake in their earlier contributions.
  • Further mathematical deductions are shared, leading to a conclusion about the nature of solutions under certain conditions, though the validity of these deductions remains a point of discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the invariance of the geodesic equation and the implications of rotational symmetry, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some mathematical steps and assumptions are not fully resolved, particularly regarding the conditions under which certain solutions hold true, and the dependence on specific spacetime metrics is noted.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
Does there exist a form of the geodesic equation which is invariant under coordinates change ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A curve ##\gamma## is a geodesic if and only if ##\nabla_{\dot{\gamma}}\dot{\gamma}=0.## Is this what you mean?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
I don't know this notation.
 
##\dot{\gamma}## is the tangent vector to a curve. ##\nabla_{\dot{\gamma}}## is the covariant derivative along the curve. Writing ##\dot{\gamma}=\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}##, you get ##\nabla_{\dot\gamma}\dot\gamma=\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}\nabla_\mu\frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau}##.
 
jk22 said:
Does there exist a form of the geodesic equation which is invariant under coordinates change ?
The geodesic equation cannot be invariant because it has one free (vector) index. It is, therefore, covariant (i.e., form invariant) with respect to an arbitrary change of coordinates. Indeed, it is a good exercise to show that the left-hand-side of the geodesic equation transforms as a vector:

\left(\frac{d^{2}\bar{x}^{\mu}}{d\tau^{2}} + \bar{\Gamma}^{\mu}_{\rho \sigma}(\bar{x}) \frac{d\bar{x}^{\rho}}{d\tau}\frac{d\bar{x}^{\sigma}}{d\tau}\right) = \frac{\partial \bar{x}^{\mu}}{\partial x^{\nu}} \left( \frac{d^{2} x^{\nu}}{d\tau^{2}} + \Gamma^{\nu}_{\rho \sigma}(x) \frac{d x^{\rho}}{d\tau}\frac{d x^{\sigma}}{d\tau}\right).
 
@jk22 I think a precise way of asking your question is 'Does their exist a way to write an equation for a geodesic that does not require using coordinates?" @Infrared in post #2 has given it.
 
samalkhaiat said:
The geodesic equation cannot be invariant because it has one free (vector) index. It is, therefore, covariant (i.e., form invariant) with respect to an arbitrary change of coordinates. Indeed, it is a good exercise to show that the left-hand-side of the geodesic equation transforms as a vector:

\left(\frac{d^{2}\bar{x}^{\mu}}{d\tau^{2}} + \bar{\Gamma}^{\mu}_{\rho \sigma}(\bar{x}) \frac{d\bar{x}^{\rho}}{d\tau}\frac{d\bar{x}^{\sigma}}{d\tau}\right) = \frac{\partial \bar{x}^{\mu}}{\partial x^{\nu}} \left( \frac{d^{2} x^{\nu}}{d\tau^{2}} + \Gamma^{\nu}_{\rho \sigma}(x) \frac{d x^{\rho}}{d\tau}\frac{d x^{\sigma}}{d\tau}\right).

I wanted to say rotationally invariant in the 3d space. I ask this because of the following : there are circular uniform orbits by fixing theta at a certain value, but if one rotate this trajectory around the origin then it is no more solution of the 4 geodesic equation.
 
jk22 said:
I wanted to say rotationally invariant in the 3d space. I ask this because of the following : there are circular uniform orbits by fixing theta at a certain value, but if one rotate this trajectory around the origin then it is no more solution of the 4 geodesic equation.
If you are using the geodesic equation in a space that is rotationally symmetric about a point and you rotate solutions about that point, they will still be solutions.

Are doing something like simplifying the geodesic equations in Schwarzschild spacetime to solve for paths in the equatorial plane, then rotating those solutions out of the plane? The result will be a solution of the geodesic equations but not of the simplified equations.
 
For a circular motion ##r## is constant and time flows linearly. The geodesic equation reads

$$\ddot{\theta}=\sin\theta\cos\theta\dot{\phi}^2$$
$$\ddot{\phi}=2\cot\theta\dot{\theta}\dot{\phi}$$
$$\dot{\theta}^2+\sin^2\theta\dot{\phi}^2=C(onstant)$$

The second equation is divided by ##\dot{\phi}## giving by integration :

$$\dot{\phi}=A\sin^2\theta$$

Substituting in the first and multiplying by ##\dot{\theta}## gives

$$\dot{\theta}^2/2=A^2/6\sin^6\theta$$

The last equation becomes

$$\dot{\theta}^2+A^2\sin^6\theta=C$$

Thus one can deduce that ##\theta=\sqrt[6]{3C/4A^2}##

However if one considers a circular uniform motion around the y-axis then ##\theta=\omega t## increases linearly with time, hence this cannot be a solution and gives a contradiction since it should be one.
 
  • #10
jk22 said:
$$\ddot{\phi}=2\cot\theta\dot{\theta}\dot{\phi}$$
You haven't stated what spacetime you are working in, so once again we need to guess part of your problem. Please try to state a complete problem.

Assuming you are working in Schwarzschild spacetime, I believe the quoted equation should be $$\ddot{\phi}=-2\cot\theta\dot{\theta}\dot{\phi}$$
Code:
/* Maxima batch file to calculate geodesic equations in Schwarzschild  */
/* spacetime, simplifying for the case of a circular orbit (dr/dtau=0, */
/* dt/dtau=const)                                                      */

/* Load ctensor and set up for Schwarzschild spacetime */
load(ctensor);
ct_coordsys(exteriorschwarzschild);
depends(r,tau);
depends(t,tau);
depends(theta,tau);
depends(phi,tau);

/* Calculate inverse metric and Christoffel symbols */
ug:invert(lg);
christof(mcs);

/* Function to generate the ith geodesic equation. Note that Maxima  */
/* numbers arrays from 1 and the Christoffel symbol \Gamma^i_{jk} is */
/* stored in array element mcs[j,k,i].                               */
geodesic(i):=block(
    [j,k,geo],
    geo:diff(ct_coords[i],tau,2),
    for j:1 thru 4 do block (
        for k:1 thru 4 do block (
            geo:geo+mcs[j,k,i]*diff(ct_coords[j],tau)*diff(ct_coords[k],tau)
        )
    ),
    return(ratsimp(geo)=0)
);

/* Generate the geodesic equations and simplify */
[geodesic(1),geodesic(2),geodesic(3),geodesic(4)];
substitute(0,diff(r,tau,2),%);
substitute(0,diff(r,tau),%);
substitute(R,r,%); /* R is a constant */
substitute(0,diff(t,tau,2),%);
substitute(K,diff(t,tau),%); /* K is a constant */
ratsimp(%);
expand(%);
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jk22
  • #11
Yes, in fact I used wikipedia equations of motion : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_geodesics and I made a sign mistake.

But my argument is anyhow wrong since the above solution is only if ##\dot{\phi}\neq 0##, whereas a rotation around the y-axis is exactly that countercase.
 
  • #12
Erratum:
jk22 said:
For a circular motion ##r## is constant and time flows linearly. The geodesic equation reads

$$\ddot{\theta}=\sin\theta\cos\theta\dot{\phi}^2$$
$$\ddot{\phi}=-2\cot\theta\dot{\theta}\dot{\phi}$$
$$\dot{\theta}^2+\sin^2\theta\dot{\phi}^2=C(onstant)$$

The second equation is divided by ##\dot{\phi}## giving by integration :

$$\dot{\phi}=a/\sin^2\theta$$

Substituting in the first and multiplying by ##\dot{\theta}## gives

$$\dot{\theta}^2=-a^2/\sin^2\theta+d$$

Giving :

$$ (\sin(x) \sqrt(d - a \csc^2(x)) (\sqrt(d) \log(\sqrt(2 a + d \cos(2 x) - d) +\sqrt(2) \sqrt(d)\cos(x)) - \sqrt(a) \tanh^(-1)((\sqrt(2) \sqrt(a) \cos(x))/\sqrt(2 a + d \cos(2 x) - d))))/\sqrt(a + 1/2 d \cos(2 x) - d/2)=t $$(##x=\theta##, by wolframalpha)The last equation becomes

$$D=C$$

So we see it is a solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K