Expanding Universe: Verifying Space Expansion Through Galaxies

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the expanding universe, specifically how the observation of galaxies moving away from each other supports the idea of space expansion. Participants explore various aspects of this phenomenon, including theoretical implications, observational evidence, and the nature of space-time.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how the observation of galaxies speeding away is sufficient to conclude that space is expanding.
  • Others reference the metric expansion of space, suggesting that nearby galaxies are influenced by gravity while distant galaxies exhibit expansion due to weaker gravitational effects.
  • One participant argues that the expansion of space is indicated by the consistent redshift of light from distant galaxies, implying that if space were not expanding, the observed redshift would not occur.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that the universe's expansion is supported by multiple lines of evidence, including the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and the homogeneous and isotropic nature of the universe.
  • Some participants discuss Olber's paradox as a thought experiment to argue against a static universe, suggesting that the observed brightness of the night sky supports the idea of an expanding universe.
  • There is a contention regarding whether "space" itself is expanding or if it is merely the distances between galaxies that are increasing within the framework of space-time.
  • One participant mentions that space is not just expanding but also contains virtual particles and is affected by gravity, challenging the notion that space is a passive entity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of space expansion and the implications of galaxy redshifts. There is no consensus on whether space itself is expanding or if it is merely the distances between objects that are increasing.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions, such as the homogeneity and isotropy of the universe, and the implications of Big Bang cosmology, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

ggolu2
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How one can say that the space is expanding by just verifying that the galaxies are speeding away from each other?
 
Space news on Phys.org
ggolu2 said:
How one can say that the space is expanding by just verifying that the galaxies are speeding away from each other?
Galaxies speeding away from each other is what it MEANS when you say that the universe is expanding. I guess I don't understand your question.
 
ggolu2 said:
How one can say that the space is expanding by just verifying that the galaxies are speeding away from each other?

We can't. Not by just looking at galaxies. There are several key pieces of evidence that add up, namely the CMB, the observed recession of galaxies, the homogeneous and isotropic nature of the universe at the largest scales, the prediction of primordial elements created in the early universe, and more.
 
ggolu2 said:
How one can say that the space is expanding by just verifying that the galaxies are speeding away from each other?

We can predict that the universe must be expanding by looking at the sky. The sky is only as hot and bright as the Sun's surface where the Sun is located. If the universe was static and eternal, it would be as hot and bright in every direction, all star's light would sum without energy loss during travel. (Olber's paradox; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers'_paradox )

When we use that cosmological redshift to predict the same but seen as the average apparent velocity of galaxies, which is receeding, we have to add the constraint that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. That constraint is given by the simplest universes that general relativity produces, so called FRW universes, and that is the kind of universe we live in. Then we know that it happens irrespective of the observer's location, and hence is a result of spacetime expansion rather than an unlikely conspiracy among actually traveling galaxies (that they don't like our breath, say, and the farther out they are the faster they want to escape it :L).

But the evidence is much firmer than that as Drakkith describes. Going back to redshifts, there is also a natural velocity "noise" added on the cosmological expansion, signifying the gravitational effects of the superclusters like our own Laniakea [ http://www.nature.com/news/earth-s-new-address-solar-system-milky-way-laniakea-1.15819 ]. So we know they are separate effects.

And to top that the current inflationary cosmology makes the expansion inevitable. You can't predict a self-consistent universe, consistency among our observations, without it.
 
Last edited:
ggolu2 said:
How one can say that the space is expanding by just verifying that the galaxies are speeding away from each other?

The expansion of space is not a reference to the speed of galaxies but to the consistencies in red shift of element spectra from distant galaxies. Because of the red shift being proportionally the same is every direction the red shift comunicates that space itself is expanding. If space was not expanding the proportional redshift would not occur. However red/blue shift is used to determined relative velocities to earth.
 
Clayjay said:
The expansion of space is not a reference to the speed of galaxies ...
Actually, I think it IS, since "space" isn't really doing anything ... things are just getting farther apart in the framework of space-time. Google "metric expansion" for more. I know it's common to TALK as though space itself were expanding, but the consensus seems to be that space is not a thing that can bend/warp/expand, etc., it's just a part of the space-time framework in which things happen.
 
phinds said:
Actually, I think it IS, since "space" isn't really doing anything ... things are just getting farther apart in the framework of space-time. Google "metric expansion" for more. I know it's common to TALK as though space itself were expanding, but the consensus seems to be that space is not a thing that can bend/warp/expand, etc., it's just a part of the space-time framework in which things happen.

(Assuming Big Bang cosmology) Before the BB there was no space - time. "The center of expansion today is every point in the universe because every point was the same point in the beginning". (Allen Sandage)

Space is doing much more than expanding, it is full of virtual particles. Also space does bend due to gravity.

So, as mentioned in this forum - the big bang did not happen as a place in space but as a place in time.

There is no space outside of space-time. Theoretically speaking in BB cosmology.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K