I Expanding Universe without dark energy

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter takacszoltan87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of an expanding universe without dark energy, suggesting that stars might move apart like a balloon in a vacuum. While distant galaxies do move away from each other, models without dark energy fail to match the observed expansion of the universe. The consensus is that dark energy is necessary to explain the current expansion profile. The analogy of a balloon is critiqued, as there is no pressure in a vacuum to drive such movement. Ultimately, while the idea is intriguing, it does not align with scientific observations.
takacszoltan87
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Question of a noob.
Dear all!

I'm not a scientist, but I'm thinking about something, I'm curious, is it possible to believe that our universe is in a vacuum, the stars are moving away a not because of the dark energy but becouse it behave like a luffbaloon in a vacoom. Sorry for noob questions.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The stars don't move away. Only distant galaxies do.

Yes, they move apart even in models without dark energy. However, no matter how you play around with the mix of matter and radiation in the model universe you cannot get the expansion profile to match the universe we see around us. To get what we see you have to add dark energy to the models.

So although you can have an expanding universe without dark energy, it does not appear to be the one we live in.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, PeroK and takacszoltan87
takacszoltan87 said:
becouse it behave like a luffbaloon in a vacoom
That behavior is driven by the pressure of the gas inside a balloon. In a vacuum there is no pressure between stars and other celestial objects that aren't effectively in contact with each other, and there is no material outer boundary to press against.
 
  • Like
Likes takacszoltan87
takacszoltan87 said:
TL;DR Summary: Question of a noob.

Dear all!

I'm not a scientist, but I'm thinking about something, I'm curious, is it possible to believe that our universe is in a vacuum, the stars are moving away a not because of the dark energy but becouse it behave like a luffbaloon in a vacoom. Sorry for noob questions.
Okay, Thank you very much for everyone, it make sense!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top