Expansion of a point-charge potential

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Morberticus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the expansion of a point-charge potential using the formula \(\frac{1}{|x_1-x_2|} = \sum_{l=0} \frac{r_{<}^l}{r_{>}^{l+1}}P_{l}\left(\cos\left(\gamma\right)\right)\), where \(r_<\) and \(r_>\) denote the lesser and greater of \(|x_1|\) and \(|x_2|\), respectively, and \(P_l\) are Legendre polynomials. Participants recommend referencing Carlson and Rushbrooke's 1950 paper for the correct expansion equations, which significantly improved the results for one user. The discussion highlights challenges in achieving the expected potential curve and the need for integrability in the function being analyzed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Legendre polynomials
  • Familiarity with point-charge potentials
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics
  • Basic principles of integrable functions in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Carlson and Rushbrooke's 1950 paper for correct expansion techniques
  • Explore advanced applications of spherical harmonics in potential theory
  • Investigate methods for constructing integrable functions in molecular integrals
  • Learn about numerical methods for approximating potentials near singularities
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and researchers working on potential theory, particularly those involved in molecular integrals and the mathematical modeling of point-charge interactions.

Morberticus
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I'm currently trying to manipulate the expansion

\frac{1}{|x_1-x_2|} = \sum_{l=0} \frac{r_{&lt;}^l}{r_{&gt;}^{l+1}}P_{l}\left(cos\left(\gamma\right)\right)

Where r< is the lesser of |x1| and |x2| and P_l are the legendre polynomials.

I have included up to 4 terms and the resultant potential isn't resembling the expected potential curve. Does anyone have any experience with such expansions, or would you recommend a different expansion (I ultimately need it to make a function integrable) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Morberticus said:
I'm currently trying to manipulate the expansion

\frac{1}{|x_1-x_2|} = \sum_{l=0} \frac{r_{&lt;}^l}{r_{&gt;}^{l+1}}P_{l}\left(cos\left(\gamma\right)\right)

Where r< is the lesser of |x1| and |x2| and P_l are the legendre polynomials.

I have included up to 4 terms and the resultant potential isn't resembling the expected potential curve. Does anyone have any experience with such expansions, or would you recommend a different expansion (I ultimately need it to make a function integrable) ?


What is the resultant potential you are getting, and what were you expecting? What exactly are you trying to make integrable?
 
Here you go:
Carlson and Rushbrooke, "On the expansion of a coulomb potential in spherical harmonics"
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (1950), 46: 626-633
doi:10.1017/S0305004100026190

Equations Ia and Ib give you the correct expansion.
 
alxm said:
Here you go:
Carlson and Rushbrooke, "On the expansion of a coulomb potential in spherical harmonics"
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (1950), 46: 626-633
doi:10.1017/S0305004100026190

Equations Ia and Ib give you the correct expansion.

Hi, thanks. I have implemented Ib and it seems to have made an improvement.

gabbagabbahey: When considering |x1-X|^-1: If X is close to the origin and on the z axis, I get a predictable approximation to |x1-X|^-1 (i.e. If I plot the approximate potential across the singularity, I get a finite peak). However, if X is placed further away from the origin, the potential changes, and a caldera forms. I ultimately am constructing plane-wave molecular integrals, so perhaps this isn't even the best approach.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
924
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K