Expansion of Fermat's Little Theorem

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pacdude9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Theorem
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 3K views
pacdude9
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've got a pair of (related) problems that are keeping me stumped. The two problems they are asking me to prove are:

[tex]p^{(q-1)} + q^{(p - 1)} \equiv 1 \; (\!\!\!\!\!\! \mod \, pq)[/tex]

[tex]a^{\phi(b)} + b^{\phi(a)} \equiv 1<br /> \; (\!\!\!\!\!\! \mod \, ab)[/tex]

Where [tex]\phi(n)[/tex] is Euler's Totient Function.

I know that these are similar, as the second problem is using Euler's Theorem, a generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem, I just can't seem to figure them out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show:
[tex]p^{q-1}+q^{p-1}\equiv 1 \pmod{p}[/tex]
? If so can you do the same mod q and combine these results to get it mod pq?
 
BTW you are probably forgetting some requirements, because as stated your identities are false. Take for instance a=4, b=6, then you get:
[tex]\phi(a)=\phi(b)=2[/tex]
[tex]a^{\phi(a)}+b^{\phi(b)}=4^2+6^2=52 \equiv 4 \pmod {ab=24}[/tex]
Perhaps you meant for a and b to be relatively prime. And in the first you can take p=q=2 and get:
[tex]p^{q-1}+q^{p-1} = 2^1+2^1 = 4 \equiv 0 \pmod {pq=4}[/tex]
Maybe p and q should be distinct?
 
rasmhop said:
Perhaps you meant for a and b to be relatively prime.
Maybe p and q should be distinct?

Thanks! Yes, in the first one, p and q are distinct primes, and in the second, a and b are coprime.
 
Indeed, Euler's Totient Function is a very nice generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem. There is an intuitive proof for both which is studied in "Olympiad Training" but if you're a student, you may try to use group properties. (hint- consider the set {1,2,...,p-1} and the multiplication modulo p. This is clearly a group. Then, What is the order of this group ? What is the order of each element? What does Lagrange's theorem implies ? Try first with Fermat's Little Theorem, and then you may try to expand in Euler's function)