Expectation for the Harmonic Oscillator ( using dirac)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expected value of position for a quantum harmonic oscillator, particularly focusing on odd energy levels using Dirac notation. Participants explore the implications of parity in energy eigenfunctions and the mathematical formulation of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims to have shown that the expected value of position is zero for all odd energy levels, but expresses uncertainty about a specific step in their proof.
  • Another participant suggests that instead of manipulating the wavefunction, the position operator should be expressed in terms of creation and annihilation operators, indicating a different approach to the problem.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of obtaining a non-zero expected value for even energy levels, with one participant questioning the intuition behind such a result.
  • A participant points out potential issues with the notation used in the proof, suggesting that operators should not appear in bras or kets and providing a corrected form of the wavefunction.
  • There is a discussion about the integral of odd and even functions, particularly how the integral of an odd function results in zero, while the implications for even functions are questioned.
  • A participant asks for clarification on what is meant by "energy," specifically inquiring about the Hamiltonian involved in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach consensus on the approach to the problem, with multiple competing views on how to handle the expected value calculations and differing opinions on the implications for even energy levels.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the mathematical steps taken in the proof, particularly concerning the use of Dirac notation and the treatment of operators. The discussion also highlights the dependence on definitions of energy and the Hamiltonian.

Somali_Physicist
Messages
117
Reaction score
13
I've been trying to form a proof using , using majorly dirac notation.There has been claims that its much better to use in QM.

The question i wanted to generally show that the expected value is Zero for all odd energy levels.I believe i have solved the question but I am a bit Iffy about a step i took:

<x>n = <Ψn|x|Ψn> = L
for a given Ψn = (A+)n(n!)-2
Energy eigen functions have definite parity, assume for all odd n's if one is zero the rest should follow.
Take n = 1
=> L = <(A+)(n!)-2|x|(A+)(n!)-2>
= (n!)-1 <(A+)|x|(A+)>
B = <(A+)|x|(A+)>
Define A+ = Lx + iC : B,C are Real
=> <Lx+iC|x|Lx+iC>
(Bit iffy after these steps)
= <Lx|x|Lx|> + <iC|x|iC>
= <L|x3|L>+<C|x|C>
as ∫x2n+1dx for limits [-∞,∞] and n =0,1,2,3...
=> 0
we find B=0
therefore
<x>n = 0
For odd ns.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What about even values of ##n##? You are going about it backwards. Instead of replacing ##\psi_n##, write operator ##x## in terms of ##a^{\dagger}## and ##a## and use your knowledge of what ##a^{\dagger}|\psi_n>## and ##a|\psi_n>## are equal to.
 
kuruman said:
What about even values of ##n##? You are going about it backwards. Instead of replacing ##\psi_n##, write operator ##x## in terms of ##a^{\dagger}## and ##a## and use your knowledge of what ##a^{\dagger}|\psi_n>## and ##a|\psi_n>## are equal to.
Surely you wouldn't get an actual value for even values.That would be extremely counter intuitive, that said I will try your advice.
 
You wrote a couple of things that don't make sense.
Somali_Physicist said:
Ψn = (A+)n(n!)-2
This should be
$$
|\psi_n\rangle = \frac{(A^\dagger)^n}{\sqrt{n!}} | 0 \rangle
$$

Somali_Physicist said:
=> L = <(A+)(n!)-2|x|(A+)(n!)-2>
The notation here doesn't work. You can't have an operator in a bra or a ket. You should end up with something like
$$
\langle 0 | A x A^\dagger |0 \rangle
$$
and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Somali_Physicist
Somali_Physicist said:
Surely you wouldn't get an actual value for even values.That would be extremely counter intuitive, that said I will try your advice.
Why is it so counter intuitive? In your proof, which needs fixing as @DrClaude suggested, you have the integral ∫x2n+1dx where n is odd. What would happen to this integral if n were even? Say n = 2k?
 
Somali_Physicist said:
The question i wanted to generally show that the expected value is Zero for all odd energy levels.
What do you mean by "energy", i.e. what is the Hamiltonian?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K