Expectation of random variable is constant?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the conditions for a process to be wide sense stationary, particularly the requirement that the expected value E[X(t)] is constant. John questions the necessity of this condition, suggesting it seems obvious since any fixed random variable would yield a constant expectation. Steven counters by providing an example of stock price changes due to events like stock splits, illustrating that expectations can vary significantly over time. The conversation also touches on calculating the expectation of e^t, with Steven explaining that it involves the moment generating function and requires a random variable. The dialogue emphasizes the importance of understanding expectation in the context of stationary processes.
LM741
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
hi there.

currently looking at the two conditions that must be met for a process to be wide sense stationary.

The first constion is: E[X(t)] = constant

what exactly does this mean??isn't is obvious that any random variable (with fixed time) will always yield a constant expextation. I thought, for stationary prcesses, we want to try and prove that the random variable at DIFFERENT times yields the same expectation value (i.e. constant expactation).
The above condition seems to be stating the obvious...

Thanks
John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi There,

Your sayin that, we are not in need of such a condition to satisfy the stationary concept, in actual fact we are in need of it especially when for example, let's says we are modeling the stock price historically it has been trading around $20 and then all of a sudden a stock split 1:4 occurs which then makes the stock trade at around $5 can you see the difference in the expectations before and after that particular event.

Regards Steven
 
does your example incorporate fixed time??

also - can you tell me what the expectatino value of e^t is??
i.e. - E[ e^t] = ? not sure how to calculate this?

thanks steven
 
just a follow up on my last post:

the reason why I'm not sure how to do this is because the expression does not contain a random variable , therefore how can i get a density function which i need in order to solve my expectation.
E[X] = integral(xfx)dx

where x is my random process and fx is the density function.

thanks
 
Hi there,

of course if your looking at historical figure's then the time must be limited and therefore in a fixed time, in terms of your expectation it is suppose to be E[e^xt] this is the moment generating function which is an alternative to find the expectation to the integral x*f(x)dx. And as you can see
m(t)=E[e^xt]=integral e^xt*f(x) dx does involve the randam variable. To find the expectation E[x]=m'(0).

Regards

Steven
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K