Expected value for potential energy (quantum)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expected value for potential energy of a helium atom in its ground state, specifically using the radial distribution factor for a 1s orbital. Participants are exploring the relevant equations and concepts related to potential energy in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equation for potential energy and its components, questioning how to apply the formula V(r) = Z/(4(pi)E) = k (1/r). There is confusion regarding the constants involved, particularly the permittivity of free space and the significance of the charge Z for helium.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications on the equations and constants involved, while others express confusion about unit conversions and the integration process needed to find the expected value. There is an ongoing exploration of how to substitute values correctly and the implications of the wavefunction in calculating expectation values.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of discussion on certain aspects. There are also references to specific constants and values that are relevant to the calculations, such as the Bohr radius and the permittivity of free space.

Sapper6
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The radial distribution factor for a 1s orbital given: R10
Calculate the expected value for potential energy of a He atom in the ground state.


Homework Equations



i understand the integral math where I solve down to <1/r> = z/a

but now, how do i use the V(r) = Z/(4(pi)E) = k (1/r) equation


The Attempt at a Solution



i know Z is 2 for He and E is in coulombs and I need to end with joules, but I am just stumped on this part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by
Sapper6 said:
but now, how do i use the V(r) = Z/(4(pi)E) = k (1/r) equation.
 
I am trying to find the expected potential energy. The equation I have is:

Z
--------- x (1/r) = V(r)
4*(pi)*E

Z is charge which equals 2 for Helium (number of protons) and I would sub in (2/a) for 1/r

i am assuming i would use Bohr's radius here where ao= 5.291x10^10m

but I don't know how to find expected potential energy after I solved the radial integral for <1/r>.. especially what is E here
 
OK, you're missing some pretty basic stuff, which is why your confusion seemed so strange to me. First, the potential is

V(r) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Ze^2}{r}

You should recognize that expression from basic from basic electromagnetics. It's not E in the expression, but ϵ0, the permittivity of free space. Second, the expectation value of the potential energy is

\langle V(r) \rangle = \langle \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{Ze^2}{r}\rangle[/itex]<br /> <br /> If you already have &lt;1/r&gt;, you pretty much have the answer.
 
Last edited:
i am having trouble following the units. aren't you missing an e^2 term?

the units should go:

V(r) = Ze^2/(4(pi)e0) * <1/r>

Ze^2 = C^2 e0 = C/(V*m) 1/r = 1/m

So, V(r) = C*V = J

if my <1/r> is actually (2/a), i think i substitute in the following:

Z= 2 (no units for Helium)
a= 5.29 x 10^10 m
what is eo?

i have a constant that is written eo= 8.854 x 10^12 F/m and i know F is 9.648C/mol

can you please walk me through the substitution with eo?
 
Sapper6 said:
i am having trouble following the units. aren't you missing an e^2 term?
Yup, you're right. I fixed the previous post.
the units should go:

V(r) = Ze^2/(4(pi)e0) * <1/r>

Ze^2 = C^2 e0 = C/(V*m) 1/r = 1/m

So, V(r) = C*V = J

if my <1/r> is actually (2/a), i think i substitute in the following:

Z= 2 (no units for Helium)
a= 5.29 x 10^10 m
what is eo?

i have a constant that is written eo= 8.854 x 10^12 F/m and i know F is 9.648C/mol

can you please walk me through the substitution with eo?
A farad is a coulomb per volt, so ϵ0=8.854x1012 C/(V m), which are the units you had above. A farad is definitely not a coulomb per mole.

You're thinking of the Faraday constant F, the amount of charge in one mole of electrons (ignoring the sign), which is not the same thing as a farad, also denoted by F, the unit of capacitance.
 
thank you, i understand now, i appreciate the help
 
Can somebody set this straight for me (I have the same problem)? All you need to do is substitute in values? If so, where does the value of r come from, the expectation value for r, <r>?
 
To find <1/r>, you have to do the integral

\int \psi^*(\vec{r})\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\psi(\vec{r})\,d^3\vec{r}

where ψ is the wavefunction for the state.
 
  • #10
I have a question about the last expression, I mean the integral for the expectation value. If we are given potential V(x) and ground state energy E0, and corresponding eigenvector U0 , is it possible to calculate <V(x)> without knowing wavefunction?

Another question is: because V(x) is a linear operator can we assume that
<br /> \int\psi^*V(x)\psi dx=\left|\psi\right|^2\int{V(x)dx} ?<br />
 
  • #11
Mancho said:
I have a question about the last expression, I mean the integral for the expectation value. If we are given potential V(x) and ground state energy E0, and corresponding eigenvector U0 , is it possible to calculate <V(x)> without knowing wavefunction?
Perhaps. In the case of the simple harmonic oscillator, you certainly can. Did you have a specific problem in mind?
Another question is: because V(x) is a linear operator can we assume that
<br /> \int\psi^*V(x)\psi dx=\left|\psi\right|^2\int{V(x)dx} ?<br />
Nope. I don't see how you got that from the linearity of V(x).
 
  • #12
vela said:
Perhaps. In the case of the simple harmonic oscillator, you certainly can. Did you have a specific problem in mind?

Yes, I was given V(x)=1/(cosh(x-pi/2))² where 0<x<pi; I had to calculate ground state energy numerically and I got it, as well as eigenvector. then I was simply asked to calculate <V(x)>, but I couldn't get an idea how I could get it without knowing wavefunction. I tried to analytically solve Schrödinger equation with this potential but it seems too complicated, that's why I think maybe there is some other way.

vela said:
Nope. I don't see how you got that from the linearity of V(x).

OK, seems I misunderstood.
 
  • #13
You should start a new thread with your problem and showing your work so far.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K