Expected value of complex gaussian

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
jashua
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
What is the expected value of the following expression

[itex]exp(|z+\mu|)[/itex],

where [itex]\mu[/itex] is a real constant and [itex]z=x+jy[/itex] such that [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex] are independent Gaussian random variables each with zero mean and [itex]\sigma^2[/itex] variance.

When I try to take the expectation, I couldn't obtain a gaussian integral, so I couldn't take the expectation. So, can we obtain the expected value of the above exponential in a closed form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After a substitution ##y=r\cos(\phi)##, ##x=r \sin(\phi)-\mu##, the one of the two integrals looks possible. I did not check the other integral.
 
Thank you for your reply. Then, I have carried out the following integral:

[itex]\frac{1}{2\pi\sigma^2} \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{∞} exp({-\frac{r^2-2r\mu sin(\phi) + 2\sigma^2r + \mu^2}{2\sigma^2}})rdrd\phi[/itex]

The result is

[itex]exp({-\frac{\mu^2}{2\sigma^2}})\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_0^{2\pi} (\mu sin(\phi) - \sigma^2) exp(\frac{(\mu sin(\phi) - \sigma^2)^2}{2\sigma^2})Q(-\frac{\mu sin(\phi) - \sigma^2}{\sigma})d\phi[/itex]

If I've correctly found this result, even the first integral does not have a closed form due to the Q-function. So, any idea to find an approximate closed form for this integral?
 
Last edited:
How do you get that Q function? A linear substitution simplifies the first integral to ##(r+r_0)e^{-r^2}## (neglecting prefactors), which gives a Gaussian integral and a component with an antiderivative.
 
First, let me correct my result that I have given above. The correct version will be as follows:

[itex]exp({-\frac{\mu^2}{2\sigma^2}})(1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}\int_0^{2\pi} (\mu sin(\phi) - \sigma^2) exp(\frac{(\mu sin(\phi) - \sigma^2)^2}{2\sigma^2})Q(-\frac{\mu sin(\phi) - \sigma^2}{\sigma})d\phi)[/itex]The Q-function has the following form:

[itex]Q(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{x}^{∞}exp(-r^2/2)dr[/itex]

So, the term corresponding to [itex]r_0e^{-r^2}[/itex] can be expressed by the Q-function. If we go other way around, I mean if we take integral w.r.t. [itex]\phi[/itex] first, then we get a Bessel function of the first kind. In either case, we don't have a closed form. So, can we get an approximate closed form?
 
Last edited:
I don't see how you get the Q function.
$$\int_0^\infty r_0 e^{-r^2} dr = r_0 \int_0^\infty e^{-r^2} dr = r_0 \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}$$Edit: Oh, that is a result of the linear substitution.
Okay, I see... and I don't know how to avoid that.
 
The lower limit does not become 0 if you expand the expression. I mean the linear substitution changes the lower limit.