Expected Value of Election Results

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expected value of election results, specifically focusing on the probabilities associated with Party A winning the Senate and House. Participants explore the relationships between these events and the implications of their independence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present various calculations for the probabilities of different outcomes, questioning the independence of the events. Some express confusion about the rendering of LaTeX notation and its visibility in posts.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the probability calculations, with some participants acknowledging errors in previous attempts. A Venn diagram is mentioned as a helpful tool for visualizing the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the linearity of expected values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with LaTeX rendering, which may affect clarity in communication. There is an emphasis on understanding the assumptions behind the calculations, particularly regarding event independence.

vparam
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Suppose that in the 2050 election, polls show Party A has a 60% chance of winning the senate and a 50% chance of winning the house, and that if Party A wins the house, it has an 80% chance of winning the senate. Let X be the random variable whose value is the the number of congressional houses won by Party A. (a) Find the expected value of X.
Relevant Equations
##p(S|H) = \frac{p(S \cap H)}{p(H)}##
##E(X)=\sum_{s \in S}{p(s)X(s)}##
I submitted this solution, and it was marked incorrect. Could I get some feedback on where I went wrong?

Let S represent the event that Party A wins the senate and H represent the event that Party A wins the house.

There are 4 cases: winning the senate and house (##S \cap H##), winning just the senate (##S \cap \overline{H}##), winning just the house (##H \cap \overline{S}##), and winning neither (##\overline{S} \cap \overline{H}##).

I computed the probabilities for each compound event as follows:
$$p(S \cap H) = p(S|H)p(H)= (.8)(.5) = .4$$ $$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S)p(\overline{H}) = (.6)(.5) = .3$$ $$p(H \cap \overline{S})=(p(S) - p(S \cap H))p(H) = (.6 - .4)(.5) = .1$$ $$p(\overline{S} \cap \overline{H}) = p(\overline{S})p(\overline{H}) = (.4)(.5) = .2$$
This means that the expected value is:
$$E(X) = 2(.4) + 1(.3) + 1(.1) + 0(.2) = 1.2$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vparam said:
There are 4 cases: winning the senate and house (##S \cap H##), winning just the senate (##S \cap \overline{H}##), winning just the house (##H \cap \overline{S}##), and winning neither (##\overline{S} \cap \overline{H}##).
Your overbars seem to show up when I quote your post, but I can't see them in the original.
vparam said:
I computed the probabilities for each compound event as follows:
$$p(S \cap H) = p(S|H)p(H)= (.8)(.5) = .4$$ $$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S)p(\overline{H}) = (.6)(.5) = .3$$ $$p(H \cap \overline{S})=(p(S) - p(S \cap H))p(H) = (.6 - .4)(.5) = .1$$ $$p(\overline{S} \cap \overline{H}) = p(\overline{S})p(\overline{H}) = (.4)(.5) = .2$$
You have a total probability of winning the Senate as ##0.7##. And, you've assumed the probabilities are indepenent in some of those calculations. I drew a Venn diagram.
vparam said:
This means that the expected value is:
$$E(X) = 2(.4) + 1(.3) + 1(.1) + 0(.2) = 1.2$$
Two of those numbers are wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vparam
vparam said:
$$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S)p(\overline{H}) = (.6)(.5) = .3$$
Only if S and H are independent events. But it is easy to show that they are not independent.
vparam said:
$$p(\overline{S} \cap \overline{H}) = p(\overline{S})p(\overline{H}) = (.4)(.5) = .2$$
Again, only if S and H are independent events.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vparam
PeroK said:
I drew a Venn diagram.
Thank you for the reminder to use a Venn diagram! The problem breaks down more easily after drawing one out.

I've redone the calculations as follows:
$$p(S \cap H) = p(S|H)p(H)= (.8)(.5) = .4$$ $$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S) - p(S \cap H) = .6 - .4 = .2$$ $$p(H \cap \overline{S}) = p(H) - p(S \cap H) = .5 - .4 = .1$$ $$p(\overline{S} \cap \overline{H}) = 1 - p(S \cup H) = 1 - (p(S) + p(H) - p(S \cap H)) = 1 - (.6 + .5 - .4) = .3$$
This means that the expected value is:
$$E(X) = 2(.4) + 1(.1) + 1(.2) + 0(.3) = 1.1$$
FactChecker said:
Only if S and H are independent events. But it is easy to show that they are not independent.

Again, only if S and H are independent events.
And thank you for pointing this out. This explains why my previous calculations don't make sense.

PeroK said:
Your overbars seem to show up when I quote your post, but I can't see them in the original.
Is \overline the standard code for overbars, or should I use something else?

Thank you both for the help!
 
vparam said:
Thank you for the reminder to use a Venn diagram! The problem breaks down more easily after drawing one out.

I've redone the calculations as follows:
$$p(S \cap H) = p(S|H)p(H)= (.8)(.5) = .4$$ $$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S) - p(S \cap H) = .6 - .4 = .2$$ $$p(H \cap \overline{S}) = p(H) - p(S \cap H) = .5 - .4 = .1$$ $$p(\overline{S} \cap \overline{H}) = 1 - p(S \cup H) = 1 - (p(S) + p(H) - p(S \cap H)) = 1 - (.6 + .5 - .4) = .3$$
This means that the expected value is:
$$E(X) = 2(.4) + 1(.1) + 1(.2) + 0(.3) = 1.1$$

And thank you for pointing this out. This explains why my previous calculations don't make sense.Is \overline the standard code for overbars, or should I use something else?

Thank you both for the help!
I don't understand why the Latex renders only when I quote your post and not in the original. I can't see the overbars in your posts, but I can when I reply.

PS it doesn't work when I take them out of the quote box!

$$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S) - p(S \cap H) = .6 - .4 = .2$$
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
PeroK said:
I don't understand why the Latex renders only when I quote your post and not in the original. I can't see the overbars in your posts, but I can when I reply.

PS it doesn't work when I take them out of the quote box!

$$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S) - p(S \cap H) = .6 - .4 = .2$$
I'm not sure why that's the case since I'm very new to Latex and it seems to show up properly on my end. I wrote up everything again using an alternate notation instead for visibility.

Probability calculations:
$$p(S \cap H) = p(S | H) p(H)= (.8)(.5) = .4$$ $$p(S \cap H^{\mathrm{C}}) = p(S) - p(S \cap H) = .6 - .4 = .2$$ $$p(H \cap S^{\mathrm{C}}) = p(H) - p(S \cap H) = .5 - .4 = .1$$ $$p(S^{\mathrm{C}} \cap H^{\mathrm{C}}) = 1 - p(S \cup H) = 1 - (p(S) + p(H) - p(S \cap H)) = 1 - (.6 + .5 - .4) = .3$$

Expected value computation:
$$E(X) = 2(.4) + 1(.1) + 1(.2) + 0(.3) = 1.1$$
 
1.1 is right. Good job working out the probabilities. Also, his is a trick question!

Expectancies add linearly. Let ##S## be the number of senate seats won, and ##H## the number of house seats won (each is either 0 or 1. This is called an indicator variable and is a very common idea to use)

Then you want to compute ##E(S+H)=E(S)+E(H)##. The correlations are irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vparam and PeroK
PeroK said:
I don't understand why the Latex renders only when I quote your post and not in the original. I can't see the overbars in your posts,
Same here.
PeroK said:
but I can when I reply.

PS it doesn't work when I take them out of the quote box!

$$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S) - p(S \cap H) = .6 - .4 = .2$$
When I reply to you, the overline of the first H shows.

$$p(S \cap \overline{H}) = p(S) - p(S \cap H) = .6 - .4 = .2$$
And now it doesn't. (There is an overline of the first H. If it matters, I am using the Firefox browser.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K