Experimental Determination of Speed of Sound in Steel and Aluminum Rods

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the speed of sound in steel and aluminum rods using experimental data obtained from Logger Pro. The calculated speeds were 4196.91 m/s for aluminum and 5088.97 m/s for steel, both significantly lower than the accepted values of 5100 m/s and 5960 m/s, respectively. The user expressed concerns about potential errors in their data or calculations, while another participant noted that experimental errors and uncertainties are common. The importance of significant figures in reporting results was also emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and sound propagation
  • Familiarity with Logger Pro software for data analysis
  • Knowledge of calculating velocity using frequency and wavelength
  • Basic principles of experimental error and uncertainty analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of wave mechanics and sound speed calculations
  • Learn how to use Logger Pro for experimental data analysis
  • Study methods for reducing experimental error and uncertainty
  • Explore the significance of significant figures in scientific reporting
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics labs, educators teaching sound propagation, and anyone interested in experimental physics and data analysis techniques.

momopeaches
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For my physics lab, we have to calculate the speed of sound through steel and aluminum based on an experiment we did using a microphone and a program called Logger Pro. The resulting graphs gave the frequency of the sound of the aluminum rod as 2109.38 Hz, and the frequency of the sound of the steel rod as 2578 Hz. The aluminum rod is .995m, and steel rod is .987m. We are also told that the wave length is twice the length of the rod.


Homework Equations


velocity = wavelength * frequency


The Attempt at a Solution



v(aluminum) = (2*.995)*2109 = 4196.91 m/s
The given value for the speed of sound through aluminum is 5100 m/s, so my experimental value is about 18% off of the actual value. Am I missing something, or is my data just poor?

v(steel) = (2*.987)*2578 = 5088.97 m/s
This value is also very off of the given value, which was 5960 m/s. So for this one, I have about a 15% error. Again, am I using the wrong equation, or is my data just poor?

Note that I did not do the experiment, this was data given to the students by our instructor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello momopeaches.Every experiment is subject to errors and uncertainties and not being familiar with the method used in this experiment it is difficult to estimate what the overall percentage uncertainty should be.I am guessing that the fundamental frequencies were measured by subjecting the rods to a variable forcing frequency until resonance occurred.Anyway you can only use the data you were provided with and it seems that you have done the calculations correctly.Make sure you don't present your answers with too many significant figures.
 
Since I didn't do the experiment and was just given the data, its hard for me to say what the method used for the experiment were. In past labs, my group has usually been able to have a less than 5% error. The instructor wants us to explain who we may have gotten a high percent error, but without doing the experiment, its hard to say what may have been done wrong.

Thank you for your reply. :) I've been sick for a couple weeks, so coming back and learning a whole chapter in a day makes me shaky on lab reports.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K