Explaining Finite Solvable Groups: Understanding Burnside's Theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkovMarakov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Groups
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A finite group of order paqb, where p and q are primes, is solvable according to Burnside's theorem. This implies that such a group cannot be simple unless it is of prime order. Since both a and b are greater than zero, the group cannot be simple, confirming its solvability. Thus, any finite group of this form must be abelian and isomorphic to p.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite group theory
  • Familiarity with Burnside's theorem
  • Knowledge of simple and solvable groups
  • Basic concepts of group isomorphism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Burnside's theorem in group theory
  • Explore the structure of abelian groups
  • Research examples of finite groups of order paqb
  • Learn about normal subgroups and their role in group simplicity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory and its applications in finite groups.

MarkovMarakov
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
HI, I was reading an article and it says that a finite group of order [itex]p^aq^b[/itex], where p, q are primes, is solvable and therefore not simple. But I can't quite understand why this is so. I do recall a theorem called Burnside's theorem which says that a group of such order is solvable. But then I don't see how it follows that the group is simple. Could someone please explain? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A simple solvable group has to be of prime order. Indeed, a simple group does not have any normal subgroups, so the only subnormal series has to be [itex]\{1\}\leq G[/itex]. But solvability says that the quotient needs to be abelian. This means that G is abelian and simple and means that it's isomorphic to [itex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/itex].

So a group of order [itex]p^aq^b[/itex] with a,b>0 has to be solvable. If it were simple then it had to be of prime order. But this cannot be since both a,b>0.
 
@micromass: Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K