Explaining Non Archimedean Norm Proof

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter frb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The proof of non-Archimedean norms on a field K establishes that if there exists a constant C > 0 such that for all integers n, the inequality |n.1| ≤ C holds, then the strong triangle inequality is satisfied. The proof utilizes the properties of norms, specifically showing that |x + y| ≤ max(|x|, |y|) as n approaches infinity. Key steps include analyzing the binomial expansion and demonstrating that the limit of the expression converges to the maximum of the norms involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of norms in field theory
  • Familiarity with the strong triangle inequality
  • Knowledge of binomial coefficients and their properties
  • Basic concepts of limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of non-Archimedean fields
  • Explore the implications of the strong triangle inequality in functional analysis
  • Learn about the applications of norms in algebraic structures
  • Investigate the relationship between norms and convergence in sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone studying field theory or normed spaces will benefit from this discussion.

frb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
can someone explain this proof please, I added a star to the inequalities I don't see/understand.

if | | is a norm on a field K and if there is a C > 0 so that for all integers n |n.1| is smaller than or equal to C, the norm is non archimedean (ie the strong triangle inequality is true)

proof: if x and y in K

\[<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> |x + y|^n \le \sum\limits_{k = 0}^n {|\frac{{n!}}{{k!(n - k)!}}} x^k y^{n - k} | \le *(n + 1).C.\max \left( {|x|,|y|} \right)^n \\ <br /> |x + y| \le *\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left[ {(n + 1)C.\max \left( {|x|,|y|} \right)^n } \right]^{1/n} * = \max \left( {|x|,|y|} \right) \\ <br /> \end{array}<br /> \]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does |ab| = |a||b| hold? Then for the first inequality, you can split the summand into the product of three norms. The first norm is that of an integer, hence is no greater than C. Then you have |xk||yn-k| which is no greater than max(|x|,|y|)n. The sum goes from k=0 to n, i.e. it has n+1 terms, accounting for the (n+1) factor on the right side of the inequality. Next, by establishing |x+y|n < X, where X is the rightmost expression on the first line, you get |x+y| < X1/n. n is arbitrary here, so this inequality holds for all n, and hence it holds for the limit as n goes to infinity. For an analogy, observe that 0 < 1/n for all n, hence 0 < \lim _{n\to\infty }1/n. Finally, since [max(|x|,|y|)n]1/n = max(|x|,|y|), you can pull it out of the limit. Then I guess [(n+1)C]1/n goes to 1 as n goes to infinity.
 
I get it, thanks for helping.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K