Explaining the Proof for Divergence of a Given Sequence

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by {an} = (-n^4 + n^3 + n)/(2n + 7) diverges to negative infinity as n approaches infinity. The proof requires establishing that for any M > 0, there exists an N such that if n > N, then |f(n)| > M, where f(n) is the sequence. The key step involves simplifying the expression by dividing the numerator and denominator by the highest power of n, leading to the conclusion that N must satisfy the inequality N > (2M)^(1/3).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and divergence in calculus
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their behavior at infinity
  • Knowledge of inequalities and how to manipulate them
  • Experience with exploratory arguments in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of limits and divergence in calculus
  • Learn how to apply the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Explore polynomial long division and its applications in limits
  • Investigate the use of exploratory arguments in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on sequences and series, as well as educators looking for examples of divergence proofs.

MathSquareRoo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the given sequence diverges to infinity.
{an} = (-n^4+n^3+n)/(2n+7)

Homework Equations



Diverges definition

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have:

Let M>0 and let N= something.

I'm having a hard time figuring out what N should equal for the proof. I know I have to make the numerator smaller and denominator larger (I think), but I get confused. Can someone explain it please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathSquareRoo said:

Homework Statement



Prove that the given sequence diverges to infinity.
{an} = (-n^4+n^3+n)/(2n+7)

Homework Equations



Diverges definition

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have:

Let M>0 and let N= something.

I'm having a hard time figuring out what N should equal for the proof. I know I have to make the numerator smaller and denominator larger (I think), but I get confused. Can someone explain it please?

The first thing you must notice is with that minus sign in the numerator on the ##n^4## term, this isn't going to go to ##+\infty##. It will go to ##-\infty##. Let's call your fraction ##f(n)## for the moment. Start by writing the careful definition of the statement$$
\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}f(n) = -\infty$$Then you will know what you must prove.

[Edit, added later]: Alternatively you could show ##|f(n)|\rightarrow \infty## and observe that ##f(n)<0## for large ##n##.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I understand that it will diverge to negative infinity. I still need help understanding how to get the N for the proof. Can you help?
 
MathSquareRoo said:
Yes, I understand that it will diverge to negative infinity. I still need help understanding how to get the N for the proof. Can you help?

I don't know if you saw may later edit, which is the method I would use. Given ##M>0##, to find ##N## you generally use an exploratory argument which is kind of working backwards with estimates. So start with$$
\left | \frac{-n^4+n^3+n}{2n+7}\right |\ge ...$$and underestimate it to get something workable. I would start with the old calculus trick of dividing numerator and denominator by the highest power of ##n##. Then work on making the denominator larger and the numerator smaller to underestimate it with something that still goes to infinity.

[Edit]: Edited it twice. I had it right the first time. :frown:
 
Last edited:
For sufficiently large n, the highest degree term will dominate. For sufficiently large n, (-n^4+n^3+n)/(2n+7) will be approximately -(n^3)/2.
 
I'm sorry, I still don't understand how to write the proof for this divergent sequence. I have a similar problem done correctly I believe. Can someone help me write a proof like the following one, but for this sequence above??

Here is a similar lim, I think I have correctly proved.

{an}=(n^2+1)/(n-2)

Proof: Let M>0 and let N=2M. Then n>N implies 1/2n>M which implies (n^2+1)/(n-2)<n^2/2n=1/2n>M. Hence, lim n--> {an}=+∞.
 
LCKurtz said:
I don't know if you saw may later edit, which is the method I would use. Given ##M>0##, to find ##N## you generally use an exploratory argument which is kind of working backwards with estimates. So start with$$
\left | \frac{-n^4+n^3+n}{2n+7}\right |\ge ...$$and underestimate it to get something workable. I would start with the old calculus trick of dividing numerator and denominator by the highest power of ##n##. Then work on making the denominator larger and the numerator smaller to underestimate it with something that still goes to infinity.

[Edit]: Edited it twice. I had it right the first time. :frown:

MathSquareRoo said:
I'm sorry, I still don't understand how to write the proof for this divergent sequence. I have a similar problem done correctly I believe. Can someone help me write a proof like the following one, but for this sequence above??

Here is a similar lim, I think I have correctly proved.

{an}=(n^2+1)/(n-2)

Proof: Let M>0 and let N=2M. Then n>N implies 1/2n>M which implies (n^2+1)/(n-2)<n^2/2n=1/2n>M. Hence, lim n--> {an}=+∞.

Did you try what I suggested? If so, how far have you gotten? Show us.
 
I get (-n^3/2). Then I"m not sure how to solve for the N that I need.
 
MathSquareRoo said:
I get (-n^3/2). Then I"m not sure how to solve for the N that I need.

I have no idea where you got that but, as an example of solving for ##N##, you are given an ##M## and you want ##n^{3/2} > M## for ##n > N##. So solve the inequality ##n^{3/2} > M## for ##n## to see how large ##n## needs to be. Then choose ##N## so that if ##n>N## you can guarantee ##n## is as large as it needs to be to make it work.
 
  • #10
I'm sorry, I meant (-n^3)/2. So do I set (-n^3)/2 > M and solve for n?
 
  • #11
MathSquareRoo said:
I'm sorry, I meant (-n^3)/2. So do I set (-n^3)/2 > M and solve for n?

Yes, same idea. You want the absolute value though: ##\frac{n^3}{2}>M##. So how big does ##n## need to be? What ##N## will work?
 
  • #12
N>(2M)^1/3

Is that correct?
 
  • #13
MathSquareRoo said:
N>(2M)^1/3

Is that correct?

That is how you determine how large N needs to be with an exploratory argument. Now, at this point, we have, if ##n>N## $$
\left | \frac{-n^4+n^3+n}{2n+7}\right |\ge ...\hbox{ your steps here }...\ge n^{\frac 3 2}> M$$

To write up the argument you would phrase it like this: Given ##M>0## if ##n>(2M)^\frac 1 3## then$$
\left | \frac{-n^4+n^3+n}{2n+7}\right |\ge ...\hbox{ your steps here }...\ge n^{\frac 3 2}> M$$Notice in this last paragraph, it looks like you magically came up with ##n>(2M)^\frac 1 3##, but it came from the exploratory argument.

I hope this has helped you understand the argument. Also note that since you never posted how you got the ##\frac {n^3} 2##, I am not vouching for your complete argument. I will leave that to you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K