# Showing that partial sums diverge to infinity

• Mr Davis 97
In summary: An infinite series is convergent iff the partial sums are convergent. An an infinite series is divergent iff the partial sums are divergent.
Mr Davis 97

## Homework Statement

Let ##\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n## be a series with nonnegative terms which diverges, and let ##(s_n)## be the sequence of partial sums. Prove that ##\lim_{n\to\infty} s_n = \infty##.

## The Attempt at a Solution

This isn't a difficult problem, but I want to make sure my details are right.

Note that ##(s_n)## is an increasing sequence that is not convergent. By the monotone convergence theorem, we can conclude that ##(s_n)## is unbounded above. Since we have a sequence that is increasing and unbounded above and does not converge, we see that ##\lim_{n\to\infty}s_n=\infty## ☐

Here is my problem: is this enough to show that ##\lim_{n\to\infty}s_n=\infty##? In my textbook, the definition of an infinite limit is this: ##\forall M\in\mathbb{R}\exists N\in \mathbb{N}\forall n\ge N, s_n>M##. So is what I said, that the sequence is increasing, unbounded above and does not converge, sufficient to show that this definition is true?

And here is my problem: What does that mean?
Mr Davis 97 said:
Let ##\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n## be a series ... which diverges

fresh_42 said:
And here is my problem: What does that mean?
I believe this means that ##\forall n\in \mathbb{N}, a_n\ge 0##.

Mr Davis 97 said:
I believe this means that ##\forall n\in \mathbb{N}, a_n\ge 0##.
No, that's the meaning of "nonnegative". I substituted this part on purpose by ... in my quote. I mean, what is divergence of a series to you? To me, it is exactly the divergence of the sequence of partial sums. Now, if you make this - my definition - into a statement, which has to be proven, then you obviously used something else to define a divergent series. What is it?

fresh_42 said:
No, that's the meaning of "nonnegative". I substituted this part on purpose by ... in my quote. I mean, what is divergence of a series to you? To me, it is exactly the divergence of the sequence of partial sums. Now, if you make this - my definition - into a statement, which has to be proven, then you obviously used something else to define a divergent series. What is it?
An infinite series is convergent iff the partial sums are convergent. An an infinite series is divergent iff the partial sums are divergent.

We know that ##(s_n)## diverges. I guess the idea of the problem is to show that it specifically diverges to infinity.

So a divergent series means, that the sequence of partial sums does not converge.
Let me be correct: ##S_n## converges to ##L## means: ##\exists \, L\in \mathbb{R} \,\forall\,\varepsilon>0\,\exists \,N_\varepsilon \in \mathbb{N}\,\forall \,n>N_\varepsilon \,:\, |S_n-L|< \varepsilon##
Then divergences is: ##\forall \,L \in \mathbb{R}\,\exists\,C_L>0\,\forall\, n\in \mathbb{N}\,\exists \,N_n > n \,:\,|S_{N_n}-L|>C_L\quad (*)##

So for any potential limit ##L## there is a minimum distance ##C_L## where we find a sequence element outside, if we only go far enough with the index.
[I hope this is correct so far.]

Now how can we conclude from ##S_n \leq S_{n+1}## and the given ##(*)## that ##\forall M\in\mathbb{R}\exists N_M\in \mathbb{N}\forall n\ge N_M, s_n>M\,?##
[Do you agree so far? It's a bit late here for so many quantors, so I apologize for possible mistakes.]

I would start with: Let ##M\in \mathbb{R}## be arbitrary but fixed. Then take ##L:=M## and see whether the triangle inequality (possibly its left hand side) can be used.

fresh_42 said:
So a divergent series means, that the sequence of partial sums does not converge.
Let me be correct: ##S_n## converges to ##L## means: ##\exists \, L\in \mathbb{R} \,\forall\,\varepsilon>0\,\exists \,N_\varepsilon \in \mathbb{N}\,\forall \,n>N_\varepsilon \,:\, |S_n-L|< \varepsilon##
Then divergences is: ##\forall \,L \in \mathbb{R}\,\exists\,C_L>0\,\forall\, n\in \mathbb{N}\,\exists \,N_n > n \,:\,|S_{N_n}-L|>C_L\quad (*)##

So for any potential limit ##L## there is a minimum distance ##C_L## where we find a sequence element outside, if we only go far enough with the index.
[I hope this is correct so far.]

Now how can we conclude from ##S_n \leq S_{n+1}## and the given ##(*)## that ##\forall M\in\mathbb{R}\exists N_M\in \mathbb{N}\forall n\ge N_M, s_n>M\,?##
[Do you agree so far? It's a bit late here for so many quantors, so I apologize for possible mistakes.]

I would start with: Let ##M\in \mathbb{R}## be arbitrary but fixed. Then take ##L:=M## and see whether the triangle inequality (possibly its left hand side) can be used.
I'm getting lost in the quantifiers. So I assume that after letting ##M## be fixed, we want to produce an ##N_M##. Would could this ##N_M## be? Is it at all related to the ##N_n## from the definition of divergence?

Mr Davis 97 said:
I'm getting lost in the quantifiers.
Me, too.
So I assume that after letting ##M## be fixed, we want to produce an ##N_M##. Would could this ##N_M## be? Is it at all related to the ##N_n## from the definition of divergence?
I only simply reversed all the quantifiers of convergence to obtain divergence, because you defined it as not convergent. So this definition brings them all in, and I'm not sure if I got all "<" correct. The goal is to distinguish between series which diverge due to alternation or other chaotic behavior and those which tend to infinity. This means, given any ##M## we must find an ##N_M## such that ##S_n > M## for all ##n > N_M##.

Perhaps we can go without the non-convergence here. Assume ##S_{n+1}\geq S_n## for all ##n##, then either it becomes stationary, in which case the series converges, or it grows beyond all limits. So divergence is only used to exclude the first case and we won't have to use any quantifiers.

Mr Davis 97

## 1. What does it mean for partial sums to diverge to infinity?

Divergence to infinity means that the partial sums of a series continue to increase without limit, getting larger and larger as more terms are added.

## 2. How do you show that partial sums diverge to infinity?

In order to show that partial sums diverge to infinity, you must prove that the limit of the partial sums as the number of terms approaches infinity is equal to infinity. This can be done using techniques from calculus, such as the squeeze theorem or the limit comparison test.

## 3. Why is it important to show that partial sums diverge to infinity?

Showing that partial sums diverge to infinity is important because it indicates that the series does not have a finite sum and is therefore considered "divergent". This is significant in various fields of mathematics and science, as it can help determine the behavior and properties of a given series.

## 4. Can partial sums ever converge to infinity?

No, partial sums cannot converge to infinity. Convergence means that the series has a finite sum, while divergence to infinity indicates that the series does not have a finite sum. These are two opposite outcomes and cannot occur simultaneously.

## 5. Are there any real-world applications of proving partial sums diverge to infinity?

Yes, there are several real-world applications of proving partial sums diverge to infinity. For example, it can be used in economics to analyze the growth of a company's profits or market trends. It can also be used in physics to understand the behavior of infinite series in equations and models. Additionally, it has applications in computer science, such as in algorithms and data structures.

• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
349
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
492
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
883
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
574
• Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
2K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
• Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K