Explanation of Multiverse Past in Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concepts of multiverse theory and time travel as presented in Brian Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos." It highlights two key ideas: the notion that traveling back in time leads to a parallel universe where changes do not affect the original universe, and the idea that the past is immutable, with actions taken being a fulfillment of destiny. The conversation also connects these theories to the double slit experiment, suggesting that unobserved states represent potential outcomes, while observed states yield definitive results, akin to the behavior of photons in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multiverse theory
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly the double slit experiment
  • Knowledge of Brian Greene's work, specifically "Fabric of the Cosmos"
  • Basic grasp of Stephen Hawking's theories, including imaginary time
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of multiverse theory on time travel
  • Study the double slit experiment and its relevance to quantum observation
  • Explore Stephen Hawking's concept of imaginary time and its applications
  • Investigate the Hawking-Hartle wave function and its significance in quantum cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and enthusiasts of theoretical physics who are interested in the intersection of multiverse theory and time travel concepts.

IndiaNut92
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi-
I recently read Brian Greene's Fabric of the Cosmos which led me to think of an interesting concept that I would appreciate further explanation on. On page 456 Greene describes how in the multiverse view, if you traveled back to the past, you would have gone back to a past in a parallel universe and so any changes you would make in the parallel past would not affect the universe in which you came from.
Another theory he explained is that the past is unalterable and that any actions you take in the past, happened originally and so you were just fulfilling your "destiny" or rather committing the same actions that you had already done in the past, even if it was before your birth, etc.
These two ideas made me wonder: For example, in the double slit experiment, when an unobserved photon passes through, it appears in a wave pattern, however when it is observed, the probability wave collapses and it becomes a point particle. I am curious as to if this explanation can also work for both theories of time travel.
Since there are many parallel universes in the multiverse that we are not physically conscious of, could this be the "wave," similar to the photon? Likewise by going into the past, which would be "unchangeable" would this probability wave shrink, leaving us as the point particle so to speak, which would mean this past that we were conscious of could only have one outcome that we couldn't change.

I'm sorry if this is confusing, but I've done my best to describe this idea, jumbled as it may be. I appreciate your time in trying to explain if the combination of these ideas has already been thought of, if they're totally crazy or wrong, or just any comments or concerns in general. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
good book..one of my favorites...

These two ideas made me wonder: For example, in the double slit experiment, when an unobserved photon passes through, it appears in a wave pattern, however when it is observed, the probability wave collapses and it becomes a point particle. I am curious as to if this explanation can also work for both theories of time travel.
maybe: Brian Greene says this in the same Chapter

We might one day find...that the act of conscious observation is an integral element of quantum mechanics, being the catalyst that coaxes one outcome from the quantum hze to be realized."


Since there are many parallel universes in the multiverse that we are not physically conscious of, could this be the "wave," similar to the photon?

Stephen Hawking has treated the entire universe as a quantum system...and a wave... in some of his analytical work. I think he used "imaginary" time...and the approach did not gain wide aceptance nor favor...
 
Thanks for the answer. Can you give me any links to or further reading on Hawking's analytical work that dealt with this? Also, what did he mean by "imaginary time". Many Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
585
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K