Explanation regarding electric potential energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of electric potential energy, specifically in the context of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom. It clarifies that potential energy (PE) is defined as negative due to the convention that it approaches zero as particles move infinitely apart, while kinetic energy (KE) remains positive. The relationship between KE and PE is established, where PE is twice as large as KE but negative, leading to a total energy of -13.6 eV for a ground-state electron in hydrogen. This negative potential energy is analogous to gravitational potential energy, which also decreases as objects approach each other.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and electric forces
  • Knowledge of kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Basic grasp of energy units, specifically electron volts (eV)
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the Bohr model on atomic structure and electron behavior
  • Study Coulomb's law in detail to understand electric forces between charged particles
  • Investigate the concept of gravitational potential energy and its similarities to electric potential energy
  • Learn about quantum mechanics and its advancements beyond the Bohr model
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching atomic theory, and anyone interested in the principles of energy in atomic systems will benefit from this discussion.

uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I just read this article (http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/PY106/Potential.html).
I am stuck on just one line where it says that potential energy is in negative...please read this and explain...

"""""An example : Ionization energy of the electron in a hydrogen atom

In the Bohr model of a hydrogen atom, the electron, if it is in the ground state, orbits the proton at a distance of r = 5.29 x 10-11 m. Note that the Bohr model, the idea of electrons as tiny balls orbiting the nucleus, is not a very good model of the atom. A better picture is one in which the electron is spread out around the nucleus in a cloud of varying density; however, the Bohr model does give the right answer for the ionization energy, the energy required to remove the electron from the atom.

The total energy is the sum of the electron's kinetic energy and the potential energy coming from the electron-proton interaction.

The kinetic energy is given by KE = 1/2 mv2.

This can be found by analyzing the force on the electron. This force is the Coulomb force; because the electron travels in a circular orbit, the acceleration will be the centripetal acceleration:

5m.gif


Note that the negative sign coming from the charge on the electron has been incorporated into the direction of the force in the equation above.

This gives m v2 = k e2 / r, so the kinetic energy is KE = 1/2 k e2 / r.

The potential energy, on the other hand, is PE = - k e2 / r. Note that the potential energy is twice as big as the kinetic energy, but negative. This relationship between the kinetic and potential energies is valid not just for electrons orbiting protons, but also in gravitational situations, such as a satellite orbiting the Earth.

The total energy is:
KE + PE = -1/2 ke2 / r = - 1/2 (8.99 x 109)(1.60 x 10-19) / 5.29 x 10-11

This works out to -2.18 x 10-18 J. This is usually stated in energy units of electron volts (eV). An eV is 1.60 x 10-19 J, so dividing by this gives an energy of -13.6 eV. To remove the electron from the atom, 13.6 eV must be put in; 13.6 eV is thus the ionization energy of a ground-state electron in hydrogen. """"""""

Please explain why P.E. is negative while K.E. is positive...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In a system like this, we define the PE so that it approaches zero as the particles become further and further apart and r approaches infinity. This fits with the force between the particles also approaching zero.

In order to separate two particles that are not infinitely far apart, we have to pull on them, against the force that attracts them. This means we do work on them, which increases their PE. But the PE also has to go to zero as r goes to infinity, which means that it has to be negative to begin with.
 
That explains a lot, thanks!
This is exactly like the absolute gravitational potential energy...0 at infinity and gradually dereasing (becoming more and more negative) till r reaches to the surface of earth...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K