Can Constant Observable Expectations Be Accurately Measured in a Lab Setting?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shishir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expectation
Click For Summary
Constant observable expectations can be measured in a lab setting, but they require specific conditions. The expectation value, which is an average derived from many identically prepared particles, may not always correspond to an actual observed value. For example, measuring an electron's spin can yield values of +1/2 or -1/2, resulting in an expectation value of 0, despite 0 not being an observable outcome. The expectation value can vary over time or remain constant, depending on the system being studied. Understanding the distinction between expectation values and actual measurements is crucial in experimental physics.
shishir
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the expectation of some observable is constant then can it be measured at Lab.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean, can we measure something called the "expectation value"? Or do you mean can we measure the observable?

For the first one, we can only measure many identically prepared particles and see the "average" value as the "expectation" value. For the second one, of course we can...for that is the definition of an observable...
 
The thing to keep in mind is that the expectation value is just an average value. Sometimes it will correspond to an actual eigenstate (observed value) in your system and sometimes it won't. Take an electron's spin for example. When you measure, you might get a spin value of +1/2 or -1/2. Since there is an equal probability of each being observed, your expectation value of the spin will be 0. However when you actually perform an experiment to measure the electron's spin you'll never get a value of 0 because that isn't an actual allowed value...even though its the average. The expectation value can change with time or it can be a constant. It just depends on the nature of the system that you're observing. In the case of electron spin it is both a constant and not an observed value.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K