Exploring Energy Shields in Star Wars Fiction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating energy shields similar to those depicted in Star Wars fiction. Participants agree that while magnetic fields can confine plasma, current technology lacks the capability to create effective energy shields. Theoretical concepts, such as using super-capacitors for energy storage and the Levitated Dipole Experiment for magnetic confinement, are mentioned but deemed insufficient for practical application. Ultimately, the consensus is that advancements in weaponry will likely outpace any developments in defensive shielding technology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plasma physics and magnetic confinement techniques
  • Familiarity with the Levitated Dipole Experiment and its implications
  • Knowledge of energy storage technologies, specifically super-capacitors
  • Awareness of current advancements in weapon technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of magnetic confinement in plasma physics
  • Explore the Levitated Dipole Experiment and its outcomes
  • Investigate energy storage solutions, focusing on super-capacitors
  • Examine the latest developments in advanced weaponry and their implications for defense
USEFUL FOR

Science fiction enthusiasts, plasma physicists, aerospace engineers, and defense technology researchers will benefit from this discussion on the theoretical and practical challenges of energy shields.

dontbearrogant
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
So being a Star Wars buff I can't help but wonder if it would be possible to make a similar type of energy shield as per what are mentioned in the vast collection of Star Wars books out there, any thoughts anybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A magnetic field will deflect ions, and can also confine a plasma. In principle, one could set up a plasma shell around a spaceship. How effective it would be at shielding is questionable. If the plasma is dense enough (so that the plasma frequency is higher than the laser frequency), it can reflect lasers. It could probably destroy incoming rockets, if the shell were big and dense enough. Slugs might be harder to stop, but in principle, they could be vaporized and plasmafied if the shield has enough power. Neutron beams can probably penetrate pretty easily.

It seems likely that weapons development will stay a few steps in front of shields..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dontbearrogant
I can't say that energy shields are impossible, but I can say that the concept is so far beyond out technical capability that we don't even know how to theoretically make them. Even Khashishi's idea is essentially speculation since there is no known way to confine a plasma using a magnetic field in this manner.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dontbearrogant
Drakkith said:
I can't say that energy shields are impossible, but I can say that the concept is so far beyond out technical capability that we don't even know how to theoretically make them. Even Khashishi's idea is essentially speculation since there is no known way to confine a plasma using a magnetic field in this manner.

I think it would be more accurate to say that we don't know how to create the magnetic fields required that could do the job. We contain plasma all the time inside tokamaks and in our fusion experiments. The problem is, we need a ring of physical super-magnets to create the fields necessary, and even then, there's still a lot of drift and such that are problematic. But confining plasma using magnetic fields is a quite well studied subject in plasma physics.
 
Matterwave said:
I think it would be more accurate to say that we don't know how to create the magnetic fields required that could do the job.

That's pretty much exactly what I was saying. ;)
 
Sure, I was just trying to make things a little clearer, because I think an uninformed person might read from your post that plasmas can't be confined by magnetic fields. I'm not saying that's what you said, I'm just trying to make the point more explicit is all. :)
 
On the scale of science fiction, I'd say it's very plausible. We'll probably solve all the issues of magnetic confinement before we get to the starship stage. Assuming starships run on fusion power, there will be some energy to power magnetic coils. But weapons will be so powerful that this type of shield might not be useful.
 
Khashishi said:
On the scale of science fiction, I'd say it's very plausible. We'll probably solve all the issues of magnetic confinement before we get to the starship stage.

I have my doubts. The main issue is that current confinement methods rely on magnets that are external to the contained plasma. Energy shields are typically portrayed as being on the outside of a ship, so you'd have to find a way to confine the plasma using magnets that are inside the volume enclosed by the plasma. I don't really expect this to be a possibility since this leads to a magnetic field that would push the plasma away from the ship, not contain it. I'm not saying it's an impossibility to develop shields, but you simply aren't going to do it using traditional magnetic confinement methods.
 
What if they have an external net of magnets, like an anti torpedo net? (Of course if they hit the net a part of the shield will fail)
 
  • #10
GTOM said:
What if they have an external net of magnets, like an anti torpedo net? (Of course if they hit the net a part of the shield will fail)

Then you're containing the plasma within the net of magnets, but you aren't creating a shield, just a big cloud of confined plasma with a ship in the middle. Without some kind of crazy breakthrough in physics, you simply can't create energy/plasma shields.
 
  • #11
Drakkith said:
Without some kind of crazy breakthrough
Not necessarily a breakthrough, but a way to store over time and instantly release large quantities of energy. Like some sort of super-capacitors.
 
  • #12
As stated Earlier, Weapon's development will likely outpace defense. For example in said scenario with a ship using a plasma shield. Wouldn't said ship still be very vulnerable to an enemy firing fusion warhead and detonating it a few feet from the shield? wouldn't the blast wave penetrate the shield?
 
  • #13
Building an external magnetic field is not a problem at all. A simple dipole field will confine plasma to some extent. The Earth has an external magnetic field which shields us from cosmic rays. There are actually some fusion experiments set up this way (Levitated Dipole Experiment), although work has stalled.
 
  • #14
DHF said:
As stated Earlier, Weapon's development will likely outpace defense. For example in said scenario with a ship using a plasma shield. Wouldn't said ship still be very vulnerable to an enemy firing fusion warhead and detonating it a few feet from the shield? wouldn't the blast wave penetrate the shield?

IMHO the best defence against kinetics (nukes, hypervelocity stuff) is point range defence, they can penetrate any shielding, probably one rather want an anti beam weapon shield, above reflective armor.
(As far as i know even in SW, W40k, kinetics are quite able to take out almost anything. The point is that your attack craft have to get them close.)
 
  • #15
Drakkith said:
I have my doubts. The main issue is that current confinement methods rely on magnets that are external to the contained plasma. Energy shields are typically portrayed as being on the outside of a ship, so you'd have to find a way to confine the plasma using magnets that are inside the volume enclosed by the plasma. I don't really expect this to be a possibility since this leads to a magnetic field that would push the plasma away from the ship, not contain it. I'm not saying it's an impossibility to develop shields, but you simply aren't going to do it using traditional magnetic confinement methods.

Although we might contain plasmas only using external magnets, the Earth contains some plasma in its Van Allen belt, and the Earth's dynamo is well inside its core baby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

So I wouldn't say it's all THAT far fetched that we could design something similar to do something with magnetic fields.
 
  • #16
JasonRoberts said:
Not necessarily a breakthrough, but a way to store over time and instantly release large quantities of energy. Like some sort of super-capacitors.

But that doesn't help if there's no way to contain the plasma.

Khashishi said:
Building an external magnetic field is not a problem at all. A simple dipole field will confine plasma to some extent. The Earth has an external magnetic field which shields us from cosmic rays. There are actually some fusion experiments set up this way (Levitated Dipole Experiment), although work has stalled.

Matterwave said:
Although we might contain plasmas only using external magnets, the Earth contains some plasma in its Van Allen belt, and the Earth's dynamo is well inside its core baby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

So I wouldn't say it's all THAT far fetched that we could design something similar to do something with magnetic fields.

Neither of these are confining the plasma in any way like you would need to in order to make a "plasma shield" on the outside of ship.
 
  • #17
Drakkith said:
Neither of these are confining the plasma in any way like you would need to in order to make a "plasma shield" on the outside of ship.

Why do you say this? One, the magnetic field itself protects our Earth from harmful solar winds, and two, a diffuse plasma is trapped inside the Van-Allan belt. Of course this is not the same as a plasma shield, but it gives credence to the idea that magnetic fields in a dipole configuration can be used to contain plasmas. One MIGHT not necessarily require a solenoidal/toroidal magnetic field.

Of course we are talking about science fiction, so I don't think anyone is saying a "plasma shield" is possible right now with our technology. In fact I think in my earlier post I stated clearly that we don't know how to make such a configuration possible.
 
  • #18
Matterwave said:
Of course this is not the same as a plasma shield, but it gives credence to the idea that magnetic fields in a dipole configuration can be used to contain plasmas.

I don't see how you're coming to this conclusion. I don't see anything that suggests that plasma can be contained using an internal configuration of magnets. In fact, knowing a little about how magnetic confinement works, I see nothing but the very opposite, that it isn't possible. The protection the magnetic field of the Earth provides is due to the fact that charged particles are forced away from the increasing magnetic field, not towards.
 
  • #19
Drakkith said:
I don't see how you're coming to this conclusion. I don't see anything that suggests that plasma can be contained using an internal configuration of magnets. In fact, knowing a little about how magnetic confinement works, I see nothing but the very opposite, that it isn't possible. The protection the magnetic field of the Earth provides is due to the fact that charged particles are forced away from the increasing magnetic field, not towards.

The charged particles come from the Sun, and they are trapped within the Van-Allen belts, oscillating between the North and South poles. When the charged particles move to the poles you get the Auroras. They are trapped along the magnetic field lines just as a charged particle inside a tokamak is trapped in a torus, along the field lines. The charged particles spiral long the field lines in partial cyclotronic motion. Certainly there is drift of these particles, and they don't stay trapped perfectly. We also can't trap particles in tokamaks perfectly either. In both cases, particle drift is a big problem. In a tokamak, a poorly contained plasma means having to change your heat shielding.

There's no inherent difference in the principle that charged particles spiral along magnetic field lines (cyclotron motion) between a solenoidal/toroidal field produced by external magnets, and a dipole field produced by an internal dynamo.
 
  • #20
I'm sorry I'm not seeing any connection between particles spiraling around field lines and being able to contain a plasma. In the tokamaks case, the magnets our on the outside and it's still extremely difficult...
 
  • #21
How are charged particles contained inside a tokamak? Hint: they are not kept stationary, since a stationary particle is not affected by a magnetic field.

How are charged particles contained within the Van Allen belts?
 
  • #22
Interesting, but i also have doubts. It is different that some charged particles remain near to Earth, and compress the plasma to a necessary density, how can you compress them without exterior force field?
 
  • #23
Matterwave said:
How are charged particles contained inside a tokamak? Hint: they are not kept stationary, since a stationary particle is not affected by a magnetic field.

Of course. What's you're point?

How are charged particles contained within the Van Allen belts?

I'm not sure what you'd like me to say.
 
  • #24
Honestly I don't know that said shields will ever be realized because regardless of the mechanics of making it work can be realized, the end result is that it would never be energy efficient. In order to be an effective sheild you would need the energy levels of the shield to overpower whatever the impacting energy of the weapon was. Unless your ship had access to unlimited energy, its hard to see that being effective.

It seems that it would be far more effective to develop a physical defense, a super hard, super absorbent material. Of course said material would likely be very massive but If you are at the point where you are talking about fleets of star ships and ship to ship combat, I am assuming that cheap and efficient methods of lifting cargo into orbit will have been developed.
 
  • #25
Drakkith said:
Of course. What's you're point?

I'm not sure what you'd like me to say.

-.- The point is, both mechanisms trap charged particles by making them spiral along the field lines. It's a fact that the Van Allan belt has charged particles trapped in it.

Take whatever conclusions you want to make out of that.
 
  • #26
I suppose I just don't see "trapping" particles in this manner as anything close to "confinement" in the sense that the former is a result of a continuous flow of particles from the solar wind into the Earth's magnetic field (along with other mechanisms) while the latter is the applied use of magnetic fields to purposely trap a finite number of particles without having them leak out.

Does that make sense?
 
  • #27
Drakkith said:
I suppose I just don't see "trapping" particles in this manner as anything close to "confinement" in the sense that the former is a result of a continuous flow of particles from the solar wind into the Earth's magnetic field (along with other mechanisms) while the latter is the applied use of magnetic fields to purposely trap a finite number of particles without having them leak out.

Does that make sense?

Sure, but the solar wind particles are never-the-less trapped inside the Van-Allan belts for some finite period of time. They literally oscillate back and forth between our north and south magnetic poles, by making spirals along the field lines.

Perhaps not all particles are trapped, but some are, and that was my point.
 
  • #28
After reading through this thread of replies it seems as though we have three main issues to sort out before we could make an only semi effective plasma shield, 1:A power source strong enough to not only generate the energy needed to create the shield itself but also to contain and compact the field. 2:A large enough fuel source to maintain the field and 3:An efficient way to contain and compact the field to the correct density. It also seems apparent that it would be of very limited effect vs energy weapons and of pretty much no effect vs projectile weapons, the remaining question I have is would it work vs an EMP?
 
  • #29
Drakkith said:
But that doesn't help if there's no way to contain the plasma.
True. So I guess you'll also have to use 2 omnidirectional magnetic fields that would actually hold and send the plasma into any desired position.
 
  • #30
There is no known way of making an energy shield as seen in SF. None. Plasma screens that trap charged particles might be useful for some things but I'm sceptical that they would be effective at even simplistic weapons like kinetic weapons or explosives.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K