MHB What Is the Upper Bound of Groups of Order in Finite Group Theory?

Click For Summary
In finite group theory, there is a theorem indicating that for any positive integer \(n\), there are finitely many types of groups of order \(n\). The proof involves defining a mapping \(f:G\times G \rightarrow X\) with \(X\) containing \(n\) elements, leading to the conclusion that the upper bound on the number of different groups of order \(n\) is \(n^{n^{2}}\). A participant initially miscalculated the number of mappings by not considering the exponential growth of choices for each element in \(G\times G\). The correct calculation shows that for a group of 2 elements, there are indeed \(2^{4} = 16\) mappings, not 8. This clarification highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between the sizes of the sets involved in the mapping.
pauloromero1983
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In the context of group theory, there's a theorem that states that for a given positive integer \(n\) there exist finitely different types of groups of order \(n\). Notice that the theorem doesn´t say anything of how many groups there are, only states that such groups exist. In the proof of this statement, they define a map \(f:G\times G \rightarrow X\) where \(X\) is a set with \(n\) elements. Defining a group structure in the same map by means of the product rule \(f(g_{1})f(g_{2})=f(g_{1}g_{2})\), where \(g_{1}, g_{2}\) belong to \(G\) they arrive to the following conclusion: there's an upper bound on the number of different groups of order \(n\), namely: \(n^{n^{2}}\)

My question is how to arrive to such conclusion. I am aware that, for every ordered pair of \(G\times G\) there's \(n\) images (since \(X\) was assumed to have \(n\) elements). For a concrete example, let be \(G\) a group of 2 elements. Then, there are 4 ordered pairs. Each pair has 2 images, so the total number of maps would be 4*2=8. However, by use of the relation \(n^{n^{2}}\) we get \(2^{2^{2}}=16\), i.e, there are 16 different maps, not 8. I am missing something here, but I don't know what exactly what the error is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi pauloromero1983,

In the example you gave for each element of $G\times G$ there are 2 choices in $X$ to which the element can be mapped. Since the total number of elements in $G\times G$ is 4, the total number of possible mappings is $2\times 2\times 2\times 2 = 2^{4} = 16.$

In general, if $A$ and $B$ are finite sets, then there are $|B|^{|A|}$ different mappings/functions from $A$ to $B$. Does this help answer your question?
 
ok, I think I understand now, thank you.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
850
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K