Exploring Military SF: Realistic Energy Shields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating realistic energy shields in military science fiction, particularly in the context of a small mecha using a handheld plasma shield against missiles. Challenges in space, such as high closing speeds and shrapnel threats, lead to suggestions for using lasers or magnetic fields to divert projectiles. While some participants express a desire for more technical details, others argue that relying on pop culture concepts without extensive explanations is acceptable. The consensus leans towards using technobabble to justify the technology without overcomplicating the narrative. Ultimately, incorporating plasma shields can enhance the story, but attempting to ground them in real physics may detract from the genre's appeal.
GTOM
Messages
963
Reaction score
66
I am writing a military SF, and wonder, what could be the most realistic things, that are close to the old SF concept of energy shields.
So far, i wrote that a small mecha uses a handheld plasma shield against an incoming missile. Like explosive reactive armor, it meant to shatter the projectile, before it could penetrate armor.
In space the challenge is much bigger due to very high closing speed. Even shrapnels can be pretty dangerous. Maybe ionise them with lasers, particle beams, then use an electric, or magnetic field to divert them? i guess the field has to extend to a big range from the hull. Maybe it is more suitable for a space station, and a ship should rather rely on high energy lasers and manuevering?
No hyperspace and things like that in my setting, only fusion drives.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GTOM said:
handheld plasma shield
Did you specify the working principles for that one, or it was just entrusted to the imagination of the reader?
 
Rive said:
Did you specify the working principles for that one, or it was just entrusted to the imagination of the reader?
I didnt feel i needed lengthy explanations. I described it glowed white, then destroyed the missile.
 
Then I don't think you need much more explanation for the spaceship-sized version either.

You may include some technobabble that the mecha-sized mobile one was limited in size/form due energy requirements, but the ship has enough beef to extend it and bend it to shape. That'll cover it nicely, I guess.

Once you went with the general popcult stuff without inventing any tech details to back it up you better keep it that way.
 
  • Like
Likes Melbourne Guy
Rive said:
Then I don't think you need much more explanation for the spaceship-sized version either.

You may include some technobabble that the mecha-sized mobile one was limited in size/form due energy requirements, but the ship has enough beef to extend it and bend it to shape. That'll cover it nicely, I guess.

Once you went with the general popcult stuff without inventing any tech details to back it up you better keep it that way.
I might cared more about tech details, if i knew anything about plasma and ball lightning physics, how it is possible to contain plasma without a large external structure.
 
GTOM said:
how it is possible to contain plasma without a large external structure.
There are things beyond saving once they brought up in a hard quasi-realistic Sci-Fi and popcult plasma shields are just one of them.
And the more you want to fabricate some real physics to back it up, the worse: past a point it won't do even for technobabble (sadly, Star Wars did that numerous times in their 'extra content', for example).

Please don't misunderstand: those popcult plasma shields are just nice - if you really need them for a story then you should just use them without any worry. But trying to add 'real' physics in a story where a plasma shield is used is just about messing up the genre and should be avoided if possible.
 
Last edited:
A map of a four-dimensional planet is three dimensional, so such can exist in our Universe. I made one and posted a video to the Internet. This is all based on William Kingdon Clifford's math from the 19th century. It works like this. A 4D planet has two perpendicular planes of rotation. The intersection of such a plane with the surface of the planet is a great circle. We can define latitude as the arctan( distance from one plane/distance from the other plane). The set of all points...
Back
Top