Exploring Military SF: Realistic Energy Shields

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on creating realistic energy shields in military science fiction, particularly in the context of a small mecha using a handheld plasma shield against missiles. Challenges in space, such as high closing speeds and shrapnel threats, lead to suggestions for using lasers or magnetic fields to divert projectiles. While some participants express a desire for more technical details, others argue that relying on pop culture concepts without extensive explanations is acceptable. The consensus leans towards using technobabble to justify the technology without overcomplicating the narrative. Ultimately, incorporating plasma shields can enhance the story, but attempting to ground them in real physics may detract from the genre's appeal.
GTOM
Messages
982
Reaction score
67
I am writing a military SF, and wonder, what could be the most realistic things, that are close to the old SF concept of energy shields.
So far, i wrote that a small mecha uses a handheld plasma shield against an incoming missile. Like explosive reactive armor, it meant to shatter the projectile, before it could penetrate armor.
In space the challenge is much bigger due to very high closing speed. Even shrapnels can be pretty dangerous. Maybe ionise them with lasers, particle beams, then use an electric, or magnetic field to divert them? i guess the field has to extend to a big range from the hull. Maybe it is more suitable for a space station, and a ship should rather rely on high energy lasers and manuevering?
No hyperspace and things like that in my setting, only fusion drives.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GTOM said:
handheld plasma shield
Did you specify the working principles for that one, or it was just entrusted to the imagination of the reader?
 
Rive said:
Did you specify the working principles for that one, or it was just entrusted to the imagination of the reader?
I didnt feel i needed lengthy explanations. I described it glowed white, then destroyed the missile.
 
Then I don't think you need much more explanation for the spaceship-sized version either.

You may include some technobabble that the mecha-sized mobile one was limited in size/form due energy requirements, but the ship has enough beef to extend it and bend it to shape. That'll cover it nicely, I guess.

Once you went with the general popcult stuff without inventing any tech details to back it up you better keep it that way.
 
  • Like
Likes Melbourne Guy
Rive said:
Then I don't think you need much more explanation for the spaceship-sized version either.

You may include some technobabble that the mecha-sized mobile one was limited in size/form due energy requirements, but the ship has enough beef to extend it and bend it to shape. That'll cover it nicely, I guess.

Once you went with the general popcult stuff without inventing any tech details to back it up you better keep it that way.
I might cared more about tech details, if i knew anything about plasma and ball lightning physics, how it is possible to contain plasma without a large external structure.
 
GTOM said:
how it is possible to contain plasma without a large external structure.
There are things beyond saving once they brought up in a hard quasi-realistic Sci-Fi and popcult plasma shields are just one of them.
And the more you want to fabricate some real physics to back it up, the worse: past a point it won't do even for technobabble (sadly, Star Wars did that numerous times in their 'extra content', for example).

Please don't misunderstand: those popcult plasma shields are just nice - if you really need them for a story then you should just use them without any worry. But trying to add 'real' physics in a story where a plasma shield is used is just about messing up the genre and should be avoided if possible.
 
Last edited:
I write an sf story, and an important part is an attack on a big, expensive space launch system on Earth. But what system could be built without pretty much magic? Looks like space elevator couldnt be made even from carbon nanotubes. Maybe a space cannon, that could launch cargo to space with suborbital speed, then lifted further with nanotube cables and a space station below GEO orbit?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
9K