How Does the Arch Design Enhance the Strength of My Spaghetti Bridge?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the advantages of arch design in spaghetti bridges, emphasizing how the structure's semicircular shape effectively dissipates energy and reduces tension. Key concepts such as weight conversion, torsion, tension, compression, strain, and stress are acknowledged as foundational but simplistic. The participant seeks deeper insights to enhance their project and stand out academically. Additionally, they draw parallels to real-world civil engineering challenges, including safety, material strength, and environmental factors, while referencing the Tacoma Narrows disaster as a critical case study in bridge engineering. Overall, the conversation aims to explore advanced topics that elevate the understanding of bridge design principles.
Marghk
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in my final year of high school, doing physics. We have been given an assingment about bridge structures. Basically, we build a bridge out of spaghetti, test it and discuss it.

I'm thinking of things in which I can talk about.

I've built an Arch Design Bridge. Mainly due to the fact that the abutments can hold the energy dissipated throughout the bridge. Tension throughout the bridge is diminished due to natural semicircle structure of it.

But so far I only have simplistic things to talk about. Such as weight/Newton conversion, torsion, tension, compression, Strain, Stress etc.

While I'm quite able to do these things, I want to go into depth with some ideas which will really make me stand out from the other peices. :smile:

If anyone can help it would be extremely appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hmmm. These are all good things to talk about. Now imagine if you're a civil engineer in charge of putting together a bid for a new bridge across a bay. You may only be able to speculate about things like expense, safety, strength of materials, weight of materials, construction issues, effects of tides, high winds, etc. You definitely should mention the Tacoma narrows disaster as that is the bridge event of the 20th century and is an example of aeroelastic flutter phenomenon.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K