Exploring Orbital Velocity: Significance and Applications

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of orbital velocity in relation to the speed of light and its mathematical implications. The user explores the boundary where orbital velocity equals the speed of light, deriving a formula that resembles the Schwarzschild radius. It is clarified that this boundary does not hold significance outside of Newtonian mechanics, as general relativity (GR) provides a more accurate framework for understanding such phenomena. The conversation highlights that Newtonian mechanics is a first-order approximation that breaks down under extreme conditions, necessitating the use of GR for accurate predictions. Ultimately, the photon sphere is identified as the relevant boundary for light orbiting a black hole, located outside the event horizon.
travwg33
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am fairly new to astronomy, having just finished a course this past semester in high school, and I have a question about orbital velocity.

Now, I know that the event horizon is the boundary at which the escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, but is there any significance to the boundary at which the orbital velocity is equal to the speed of light?

I quickly messed around with the math to see where such a boundary would lie and determined this:
Vorb = √((Gm)/r)

substitute Vorb for C

C = √((Gm)/r)
r = (Gm)/(C2)

This is obviously very similar to determining the Schwarzschild radius and this boudary would actually be inside the event horizon, light orbiting the singularity, but never moving out past the radius once in orbit.

I looked online to see if such a boundary was important or existed and I think I found something similar the photon sphere, but the equation is different and this sphere is outside the event horizon.

Does the boundary where r = (Gm)/(C2) mean anything?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Does the boundary where r = (Gm)/(C2) mean anything?
No. It's a coincidence that a Newtonian calculation gives the correct result for the Schwarzschild radius (he's not a child, btw). You can't expect that it works for other qunatities.
If you do the calculations in GR, you get the photon sphere result. For illustration, think that the centrifugal force reverses direction near the horizon, where relativity becomes important. Thus, it's even harder to orbit than to escape.
 
Ah ok that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying that up :)
 
Just thinking, I do not know too much about Newtonian mechanics or GR, but does this mean that NM breaks down under extreme conditions?
 
Exactly. It works if you have small velocities and weak gravity. It's like a first order approximation to the exact GR laws.
You can make it work more exactly or for more extreme circumstances if you include some corrections, like a second order approximation to GR. That's called the Post-Newtonian formalism.
Under the most extreme conditions, you use full GR.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top