Exploring the Generalization of Mercer's Theorem to Square Integrable Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the generalization of Mercer's theorem, which traditionally applies to continuous symmetric positive definite functions defined on a compact interval [a,b]. It establishes that such functions can be expressed as a series involving eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. The inquiry posed is whether this theorem can be extended to square integrable functions defined over the entire domain of R², rather than just a bounded interval. A recent generalization suggests that similar results hold under certain conditions in a first-countable topological space with a Borel measure. This exploration highlights the potential for broader applications of Mercer's theorem in functional analysis.
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,

if we consider a n\times n symmetric positive definite matrix, we can prove that it has n positive eigenvalues and n orthogonal eigenvectors, and that such matrix can be expressed as a linear combination \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i e_i\otimes e_i

Mercer's theorem extends this result to continuous symmetric positive definite functions K:[a,b]\times [a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R} by stating that K(x,y) can be expressed as \sum_{i=1}^\infty \lambda_i e_i(x)e_i(y) where e_i are eigenfunctions of the linear operator associated with K.

My question is: can Mercer's theorem be generalized to square integrable functions K defined on the whole domain \mathbb{R}^2 instead of just [a,b]\times[a,b]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know mercer's theorem, but I quote Wikipedia:

"A recent generalization replaces this conditions by that follows: the set X is a first-countable topological space endowed with a Borel (complete) measure μ. X is the support of μ and, for all x in X, there is an open set U containing x and having finite measure. Then essentially the same result holds:

Theorem. Suppose K is a continuous symmetric non-negative definite kernel on X. If the function κ is L1μ(X), where κ(x)=K(x,x), for all x in X, then there is an orthonormal set {ei}i of L2μ(X) consisting of eigenfunctions of TKa such that corresponding sequence of eigenvalues {λi}i is nonnegative. The eigenfunctions corresponding to non-zero eigenvalues are continuous on X and K has the representation
K(s,t) = \sum_{j=1}^\infty \lambda_j \, e_j(s) \, e_j(t)
where the convergence is absolute and uniform on compact subsets of X."
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K