Undergrad Can we extend the inequality 0 < sin x < x to sin(x/2), sin(x/5), and sin(3x)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality 0 < sin x < x holds true for 0 < x < π/2, and this can be extended to other forms such as 0 < sin(x/2) < x/2 and 0 < sin(x/5) < x/5 by appropriately adjusting the range of x. Specifically, the transformation of the variable does not alter the validity of the inequality, provided the new variable remains within the defined bounds. For instance, 0 < sin(3x) < 3x is also valid as long as 3x is within the interval where the original inequality holds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with inequalities in mathematical analysis
  • Knowledge of variable substitution techniques in calculus
  • Basic comprehension of the unit circle and angle measures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of trigonometric inequalities in calculus
  • Learn about variable substitution in mathematical proofs
  • Explore the implications of the sine function on different intervals
  • Investigate the behavior of sine functions for multiple angles
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, educators teaching trigonometry, and anyone interested in the properties of trigonometric functions and inequalities.

Leong
Messages
379
Reaction score
2
Given that 0 < sin x < x is true for 0 < x < π/2.
From the above, can we conclude that 0 < sin (x/2) < x/2? How about 0 < sin (x/5) < x/5? Why?
How about 0<sin 3x < 3x ? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For suitable ranges of x, sure.

If you replace x by x/2 everywhere consistently, you don't change anything, you just replaced your variable. An analogy would be to replace all "x" by "y".

0 < sin y < y is true for 0 < y < π/2
Now define y=x/2.
 
mfb said:
For suitable ranges of x, sure.

If you replace x by x/2 everywhere consistently, you don't change anything, you just replaced your variable. An analogy would be to replace all "x" by "y".

0 < sin y < y is true for 0 < y < π/2
Now define y=x/2.
Thank you very much for the explanation.
 
Leong said:
Given that 0 < sin x < x is true for 0 < x < π/2.
From the above, can we conclude that 0 < sin (x/2) < x/2? How about 0 < sin (x/5) < x/5? Why?
How about 0<sin 3x < 3x ? Why?

Yes, but you also have to change your range:

##0 < \sin x < x ## for ##0 < x < \pi/2##

Is equivalent to:

##0 < \sin x/2 < x/2 ## for ##0 < x < \pi##
 
PeroK said:
Yes, but you also have to change your range:

##0 < \sin x < x ## for ##0 < x < \pi/2##

Is equivalent to:

##0 < \sin x/2 < x/2 ## for ##0 < x < \pi##
:ok::thumbup:
 
  • Like
Likes Dhiraj Shenoy
Leong said:
Given that 0 < sin x < x is true for 0 < x < π/2.
From the above, can we conclude that 0 < sin (x/2) < x/2? How about 0 < sin (x/5) < x/5? Why?
How about 0<sin 3x < 3x ? Why?
Essentially, as long as 0<x/2< ##\pi/2## (although this is not an iff condition) , same for 3x; you want 3x to fall within an interval where the property holds. This is essentially a change of variable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K