Could Transient Radio Signals Indicate Extraterrestrial Intelligence?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper titled 'Provocative radio transients and base rate bias: a Bayesian argument for conservatism', which explores transient radio signals as potential indicators of extraterrestrial intelligence. The paper emphasizes the shift in SETI techniques towards detecting ephemeral signals rather than enduring ones, highlighting the necessity of collecting extensive data on provocative radio transients. The conclusions drawn advocate for a long stare strategy to differentiate between natural phenomena and genuine extraterrestrial signals, akin to the rigorous methods used by CERN to confirm the existence of the Higgs Boson.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) methodologies
  • Familiarity with Bayesian statistics and its application in scientific research
  • Knowledge of radio astronomy and transient signal detection
  • Awareness of the Higgs Boson discovery and its significance in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced SETI techniques for detecting transient signals
  • Study Bayesian analysis methods in astrophysical contexts
  • Explore the implications of radio signal data collection strategies
  • Investigate the role of CERN in the Higgs Boson discovery and its methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, researchers in extraterrestrial intelligence, and anyone interested in the methodologies of signal detection in radio astronomy.

Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
750
This paper 'Provocative radio transients and base rate bias: a Bayesian argument for conservatism', http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7338, discusses transient radio signals as possible signs of extraterrestrial intelligence. I knew of the 'WOW' signal, but, was unaware of other similar detection events.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I thought the "Conclusions" section of the paper was most instructive:

"Conclusions

As SETI techniques begin to turn away from the search for purposefully Earth-directed signals of enduring duration and more toward finding the ephemeral leakage associated with the complex business of maintaining an interstellar civilization, large or small, then we must come to terms with the fact that most if not all of our detections will be one of a kind…never to repeat with exactly the same parametric characteristics or in the same position in the sky. With this in mind it becomes particularly important to collect a large data set of provocative (i.e., possibly indicative of extraterrestrial intelligence) radio transients through a long stare strategy in order to build up a compelling case that they cannot all be explained by natural phenomena in much the same way the dedicated scientists at CERN used their diligence and perseverance to recently claim the Higgs Boson exists to an extremely high degree of confidence. In consideration of this it is important to realize that the finest mathematical sieve will always gather up far more straw from the haystack than it does those very special needles."

It seems that without dreamers like this we may be destined to only know life here on Earth forever.

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
765
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
12K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K