Explosive collision initial velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 3.55 kg object that breaks into two equal masses after sliding on a frictionless surface. The velocities of the resulting fragments are given, and the task is to determine the original speed of the object before the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum and the need to resolve velocities into components. There is uncertainty about whether to consider speed or velocity in the calculations. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the direction of motion and the interpretation of the problem statement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and the calculations involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the distinction between momentum and velocity, and the importance of considering both x and y components in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding the terms "speed" versus "velocity," and the implications of resolving components in the context of momentum conservation. Participants are also reflecting on the significance of significant figures in their calculations.

fernancb
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3.55 kg object sliding on a frictionless surface breaks into two masses that are both equal to half of the original mass. The velocities of the masses are 3.26 m/s due north and 4.58 m/s, 25.4° north of east. Determine the original speed of the 3.55 kg mass.

Homework Equations


p = mv
Ek = 1/2 mv^2 But this isn't an elastic collision, so the conservation of energy wouldn't work

The Attempt at a Solution


Momentum is conserved.
(I'm assuming the mass is moving in a horizontal direction)

m1x v1x = m2x v2x cos(theta)
(3.55)(v1x) = (3.55/2)(4.58)(cos 25.4)
2(v1x) = (4.58)(cos25.4)
v1x = 2.07 m/s

Erm... I resolved it in terms of the x direction so I'm not sure why it isn't working...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the fragments are moving in the north and north of east, the object is making some angle with east-west direction.
 
But didn't I do that? I took into account the fragment was moving in a North east direction... and then resolved it to get my x-component which corresponded with my initial velocity
 
If they're asking for the original speed (and not the velocity), do you need to worry about components after you determine the magnitude of the total momentum?
 
Goin out on a limb here... no? Because speed isn't a vector. But where did I go wrong?
 
What are the individual momenta of the two fragments (in terms component vectors)?
 
object moving North p=(m/2)v2
object moving north east p=(m/2)v3
 
fernancb said:
object moving North p=(m/2)v2
object moving north east p=(m/2)v3

Put some numbers to them, and express them as x and y components. Due east is the positive x-axis. Due north is the positive y-axis.
 
X-axis: (3.55/2)(4.58)(cos25.4)=7.34m/s
Y-axis: (3.55/2)(4.58)(sin25.4)+(3.55/2)(3.26) = 9.27 m/s

Resolve? So I wouldn't need to bother with angles after?

Initial speed: (sqrt(7.34^2)+(9.27^2)) = 11.8 m/s
 
  • #10
I tried 11.8 m/s and it's wrong
 
  • #11
Careful, those are momenta that you're calculating, not velocities --- kg*m/s.

Since momentum is conserved, and your total momentum has both x and y components, your earlier assumption about the "horizontal" motion of the original object wasn't true.

But what you can say now is that the original speed must be the magnitude of the momentum over the total mass: u = p/m.
 
  • #12
Oh no! so my initial velocity would be = 11.8/3.55 = 3.32 m/s
 
  • #13
fernancb said:
Oh no! so my initial velocity would be = 11.8/3.55 = 3.32 m/s

Yup. And if you'd kept more significant figures through the process you'd have 3.33 m/s at the end.:smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
925
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K