MHB Exponential Equation: If X is one more than twice Y, what is the value of X?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScrewedIre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Value
ScrewedIre
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The square of X is equal to 4 times the square of Y. If X is one more than twice Y, what is the value of X?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, ScrewedIre! (Wave)

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
ScrewedIre said:
The square of X is equal to 4 times the square of Y.
X^2= 4Y^2
Do you see that either X= 2Y or X= -2Y?

If X is one more than twice Y
X= 2Y+ 1

If you replace X with 2Y what do you get? If you replace X with -2Y what do you get?

, what is the value of X?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top