Reflecting functions over the y-axis, x-axis, and the line y=x

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hb20007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Reflection
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 4K views
hb20007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
f(-x) is a reflection over the y axis
-f(x) is a reflection over the x axis

Now, how do we represent a reflection over y=x?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hb20007 said:
f(-x) is a reflection over the y axis
-f(x) is a reflection over the x axis

Now, how do we represent a reflection over y=x?

If (x, y) is a point on the graph of f, (y, x) will be the reflection of that point across the line y = x.

Shyan said:
Its [itex]f^{-1}(x)[/itex]
Very beautiful!
What if f doesn't have an inverse? For example, y = f(x) = x2. This function is not one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse.
 
Mark44 said:
If (x, y) is a point on the graph of f, (y, x) will be the reflection of that point across the line y = x.What if f doesn't have an inverse? For example, y = f(x) = x2. This function is not one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse.

If a function is not one to one,then there is no function that is its inverse.But there is of course a relation which is the function's inverse.And that relation can be ploted.For [itex]y=x^2[/itex] we have [itex]x=\pm \sqrt{y}[/itex]which is a two-valued relation between x and y.
 
Mark44 said:
If (x, y) is a point on the graph of f, (y, x) will be the reflection of that point across the line y = x.


What if f doesn't have an inverse? For example, y = f(x) = x2. This function is not one-to-one, so doesn't have an inverse.

Every function is a relation. If ##R## is a relation, then ##R^{-1}## is a well-defined relation.
 
Okay, now how about a reflection over y = -x?
 
Let's see...a reflection over line y=-x means [itex](x_0,y_0)\rightarrow(-y_0,-x_0)[/itex].
It think it should be [itex]-f^{-1}(-x)[/itex]...ohh...sorry...[itex]-R^{-1}(-x)[/itex].
 
Yeah, makes sense...
Thanks :biggrin: