F1 control arms - Designed with downforce in mind or?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chriswh86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control Mind
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the design of Formula 1 control arms, specifically whether they are intended to generate downforce or primarily to minimize aerodynamic interference while the car is in motion. Participants explore the implications of F1 regulations on suspension design and safety concerns related to aerodynamic shapes in high-speed conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether F1 control arms are designed for downforce or to reduce aerodynamic drag.
  • Another participant cites F1 regulations that require suspension members to have a symmetrical profile to prevent them from being used as aerodynamic devices.
  • A different participant expresses concern about the safety of using aerodynamic shapes in suspension systems at high speeds, suggesting that it could be dangerous.
  • One participant acknowledges the regulations but notes the existence of symmetric airfoils, implying that innovative designs might still be possible within the rules.
  • There is a suggestion that further study of the regulations is needed to clarify what is permissible in suspension design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the design of control arms is primarily for downforce or aerodynamic efficiency, and there are differing views on the implications of the regulations and safety concerns.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific regulations regarding suspension design, but there is uncertainty about the interpretation of these rules and their impact on aerodynamic design.

chriswh86
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Are F1 control arms, upper/lower designed to supply an amount of downforce or just the ability to cut through the air with as little interferance as possible?

I had seen a photo recent and it got me woundering. Maybe someone can explain

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems
The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.
 
I imagine it would be pretty dangerous if you had a aerodynamic shape of any kind going up and down[though slight,suspension has limited movement] at 200 mph.I maybe wrong,but it just doesn't seem safe.
 
Ranger Mike said:
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems



The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.

That's indeed what the regulations say. There are symmetric airfoils though ;)
With this in mind I believe that a smart engineer can come up with a smart solution ;)
(http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2013/0/1042.html )
Or is it totally forbidden for the suspension?
Hmm, I think I should study the regulations in depth...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Adjustable spring tensioner for 90deg rotating arm
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Audio/Video Fluid Dynamics—Building a better MIDI Breath Controller
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
Graduate Too much cooling air? (Power supply failures due to condensation)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Designing an Actual Vapor-Compression Refrigeration Cycle
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Electromagnet Coil Performing Poorly
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Involuntary arm/body movements while in deep relaxation
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
My experience as a hostage
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Automotive Delco Starters -- Anyone familiar with them?
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Trying to run a treadmill motor without the controller
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
17K
Current and Future AI Threats to Humanity and the Human Response
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K