F1 control arms - Designed with downforce in mind or?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chriswh86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control Mind
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
chriswh86
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Are F1 control arms, upper/lower designed to supply an amount of downforce or just the ability to cut through the air with as little interferance as possible?

I had seen a photo recent and it got me woundering. Maybe someone can explain

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems
The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.
 
I imagine it would be pretty dangerous if you had a aerodynamic shape of any kind going up and down[though slight,suspension has limited movement] at 200 mph.I maybe wrong,but it just doesn't seem safe.
 
Ranger Mike said:
F1 rules

Suspension and steering systems



The suspension members must have a symmetrical profile for the majority of their length. This is to prevent designers using them as aerodynamic devices.

That's indeed what the regulations say. There are symmetric airfoils though ;)
With this in mind I believe that a smart engineer can come up with a smart solution ;)
(http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2013/0/1042.html )
Or is it totally forbidden for the suspension?
Hmm, I think I should study the regulations in depth...
 
Last edited by a moderator: