Factoring x^2 + y^2 | Sophie Germain's Identity

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of sums of squares, specifically focusing on the application of Sophie Germain's Identity. Participants explore whether sums of squares can be factored when the term \(2AB\) is not a perfect square, and they also delve into related polynomial factorizations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that sums of squares can be factored using Sophie Germain's Identity when \(2AB\) is a perfect square, but question the applicability for non-perfect squares.
  • One participant suggests that while the factorization \( (x+y+\sqrt{2xy})(x+y-\sqrt{2xy}) \) is mathematically valid, its practical utility is limited, especially when resulting in irrational numbers.
  • Another participant asserts that \( \sqrt{2xy} \) is irrational under the assumption that \( xy = 1 \), but acknowledges the neatness of the factorization.
  • A different perspective is introduced, indicating that \( x^2 + y^2 \) can be viewed in a broader context, such as factoring \( a^4 + 4b^4 \) using the identity, where \( 2xy \) becomes a perfect square.
  • Participants shift focus to a related problem of factoring \( y^4 + y^2 + 1 \), with one suggesting a method involving completing the square and another expressing uncertainty about the process.
  • There is a discussion about the difficulty in further factoring \( x^2 + x + 1 \) after completing the square, with participants seeking clarification on how to arrive at the factorization \( (y^2 + y + 1)(y^2 - y + 1) \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the utility of the factorization of sums of squares, with some finding it interesting but not practical, while others see potential applications. The discussion about factoring \( y^4 + y^2 + 1 \) remains unresolved, with participants sharing methods but not reaching a consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the assumptions made about \( xy \) and the nature of the numbers involved. The discussion also highlights the challenge of factoring certain polynomials without a clear method.

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
I came across an interesting website today, which stated that you can factor sums of squares IF 2AB is a perfect square known as the Sophie Germain’s Identity. Below is the website for your reference.

http://oakroadsystems.com/math/sumsqr.htm

I realize that if it is a perfect square, then the factorization would be nice and clean, but could you not do it also for non-perfect squares?

Example: factor $x^2 + y^2$

$A=x$
$B=y$
$2AB=2xy$

Therefore, $(x+y+\sqrt{2xy}) (x+y-\sqrt{2xy})$. If I were to expand this, I would get $x^2 + y^2$. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rido12 said:
I came across an interesting website today, which stated that you can factor sums of squares IF 2AB is a perfect square known as the Sophie Germain’s Identity. Below is the website for your reference.

http://oakroadsystems.com/math/sumsqr.htm

I realize that if it is a perfect square, then the factorization would be nice and clean, but could you not do it also for non-perfect squares?

Example: factor x^2 + y^2

A=x
B=y
2AB=2xy

Therefore, (x+y+sqrt(2xy)) (x+y-sqrt(2xy)). If I were to expand this, I would get x^2 + y^2. Is this correct?

Yes, that's true. The real question is: how useful is it?

For example, we can factor 25 as:

$(7 + \sqrt{24})(7 - \sqrt{24})$, but this factorization is not very easy to work with. This factors the rational number 25 into two irrational numbers, whereas the factorization:

$25 = 5\ast 5$

is much more practical.

So this raises the question: when is $\sqrt{2xy}$ rational?
 
You're right, it's not at all useful, just thought it was neat. I don't think sqrt(2xy) is rational, since sqrt(2) is an irrational number? Assuming that xy = 1.
 
Rido12 said:
You're right, it's not at all useful, just thought it was neat. I don't think sqrt(2xy) is rational, since sqrt(2) is an irrational number? Assuming that xy = 1.

It is useful. One should realize that $x^2 + y^2$ is not the expression but the form

for exampe $a^4 + 4b^4$ is $x^2+y^2$ where $x=a^2$ and $y = 2b^2$ then $2xy= 4a^2b^2$ which is a perfect square

this can be utilized to factor
 
Ah, I see. This is unrelated to the original topic, but how may I go around factoring y^4 + y^2 + 1?

I know it is (y^2 + y + 1) (y^2 - y + 1), but not sure how to get there.

The only thing I notice is that there is some kind of difference of squares going around...
(y^2 + 1 + y) (y^2 + 1 - y)
= (y^2 + 1)^2 - y^2
= y^4 + 2y^2 + 1 - y^2

Is there an easier way to factor it, other than to rearrange the polynomial like what I just did?
 
Last edited:
Rido12 said:
Ah, I see. This is unrelated to the original topic, but how may I go around factoring y^4 + y^2 + 1?

I know it is (y^2 + y + 1) (y^2 - y + 1), but not sure how to get there.

Let $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = y^2 \end{align*}$ to get $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x^2 + x + 1 \end{align*}$ and then complete the square.
 
Ah, completing the square. Before I asked the question, I got to x^2 + x + 1, but I didn't know how to further factor it. Thanks!

EDIT: Wait... x^2 + x + 1 = (x + 1/2)^2 + 3/4...how do I further factor?
 
Last edited:
Still having a bit of trouble, actually.

If we let y^2 = x
then...
x^2 + x + 1, completing the square gives me (x+1/2)^2 + 3/4

How do I get (y^2 + y + 1) (y^2 - y + 1) from that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K