MHB Factorization of Polynomials Over a Field - Nicholson Example 10, Page 215

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading W. Keith Nicholson's book: Introduction to Abstract Algebra (Third Edition) ...

I am focused on Section 4.2:Factorization of Polynomials over a Filed.

I need some help with Example 10 on page 215 ...

The relevant text from Nicholson's book is as follows:View attachment 4591In the above text, we read the following:

" ... ... Reduction modulo $$2$$ gives $$\overline{f(x)} = x^4 + x + 1$$ in $$\mathbb{Z}_2 [x]$$. This polynomial has no roots in $$\mathbb{Z}_2$$, so it fails to be irreducible ... ... "Can someone please explain the reasoning behind the statement that since the polynomial has no roots in $$\mathbb{Z}_2$$ then it fails to be irreducible?

Hope someone can help ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

You have missed an IF it fails to be irreducible...
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi Peter,

You have missed an IF it fails to be irreducible...
Thanks Fallen Angel ... you are quite right ...

hmm ... must read more carefully ... very careless of me :(

Thanks again for your help ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K