(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Fair to say there are "twice" as many square matrices as rectangular?

Is it fair to say that there are at least twice as many square matrices as there are rectangular?

I was thinking something like this....

Let R be a rectangular matrix with m rows and n columns, and suppose either m < n or m > n. Then, we can associate two square matrices with R, namely RRt, and RtR, with Rt being R Transpose.

In other words, for every rectangular matrix there can be associated (at least) two square matrices.

Google brought up nothing, so I figured I would ask it here. It's not for homework or anything; just out of interest.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fair to say there are twice as many square matrices as rectangular?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Fair twice many | Date |
---|---|

I Angle between two vectors with many dimensions | Feb 3, 2017 |

Systems of equations with many equations, more than 3 | Nov 20, 2013 |

Derive an expression to find how many times an eigen value is repeated | Feb 20, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**